[Netz]

I am aware of these limited strikes and because they were single and not multiple target take downs it is not the rule, but rather the exception.

I am talking about triggering a major war, something both Iraq, Syria, HAMAS and Hizbollah have been reluctant to do.

Israel regularly will take unilateral action on specific, limited targets as part of the ongoing enforcement of their red lines.

Regarding Iran, everyone agrees that it would be very difficult for the small IAF to hit so many targets and take them all out without incurring a major retaliation and that is where we are right now.

Iraq (Osirak) was one facility. Syria, was one or two facilities. What can they do vis Iran?
I am assuming a major EMP EW attack over Iran followed by bombings, that's the only scenario I can envision.

Israel knows Barry will not be there for them...

[MacNaughton]

73 Regarding Iran, everyone agrees that it would be very difficult for the small IAF to hit so many targets and take them all out without incurring a major retaliation and that is where we are right now. Iraq (Osirak) was one facility. Syria, was one or two facilities. What can they do vis Iran? I am assuming a major EMP EW attack over Iran followed by bombings, that's the only scenario I can envision.

What about the Israeli submarines? Are SLCMs an effective weapon against the Iranian targets? Above ground, yes. Underground, doubtful.

Israel knows Barry will not be there for them...

10-4 on that.