Were did ya get that?
It's not what the article said.
In fact, the article said the dog was shot in back of the head when the dog came *upon* the officers.
Are you suggesting the officers had time to separate and then shot towards each other?
And if what you say is true, would it still not put the shooter behind the dog?
see #77
When attacked you don’t present an easy target by grouping together. You separate.
When the officers stepped apart from each other, the dog when it turned to one or the other officer was exposing substantially the back part of its head.