[Graewoulf]

PING lists ALERT !

It time for us FReepers to request that Senators Cruz (TEXAS) and Lee (Utah), and Rep. Barton (TEXAS) file an INJUNCTION with Justice Scalia of the SCOTUS for a one year and one month delay of further implementation of the failed Mandatory Insurance Tax Federal Law commonly called Obama’care !’

BTW, Rep. Barton in a House hearing stated that HIPPA Federal Law is violated by the no privacy policy of The Mandatory Insurance Tax Federal Law commonly called Obama’care.’

If we are to continue to be a “Nation of Laws,” then this Legal conflict requires resolution by the SCOTUS.

[Liz]

Thanks for the heads-up. Another one of Ohaha's cockamamie wealth-redistribution plans. This needs to go viral:

Toni Townes-Whitley, Senior Vice President at "CGI Federal" for Civilian Agency programs, is Princeton Class of 1985---same dumbed-down class as Michelle Obama. Both are members of Association of Black Princeton Alumni.

=================================================

NOTE CGI, the designer of the Obamacare website and computer system, is the parent company of Stanley, Inc.

At the latter two employees, along with an employee of Analyst Corp, were investigated WRT State Dept passport breaches involving passports of Hillary Clinton, John McCain, and Barack Obama.

[laplata]

Thanks for the ping, Graewoulf.

I wouldn’t be surprised if Hitlery had some money go her way.

The USSA is as corrupt as any country in the world.

[nathanbedford]

Believe me, I fully share your indignation. More than a waste of money, Obamacare is an assault on liberty and it is one which will drive hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of Americans into the bankruptcy courts. I to pray for a silver bullet.

I have some problems, however, with your call for more than a year's delay.

First, one does not file an injunction one commences a lawsuit and applies for an injunction which is rarely given and only under the most emergent circumstances showing irreparable harm and a clear right to the relief.

Second, one has to demonstrate that the harm is irreparable, that is that it cannot be fixed with some other remedy such as money compensation.

Third, one has to demonstrate that the harm is personal and thereby secure standing to be a party in such action. It is not clear the two United States senators serve for that role.

Fourth, one must demonstrate that the court has jurisdiction.

Fifth, one must demonstrate that this is not a political question which to be settled not by article 3 court but by politicians in article 2 and in article 1 constitutional offices.

Sixth, even assuming the granting of an injunction which is quite improbable, the time of its application goes out of the control of those who seek to save the country from Obamacare and passes to the court.

Our dilemma here is that a year and a month, in my judgment, would serve Obama quite nicely. I think he would prefer to have the reckoning come after the 2014 election, not before. If we are not careful we would be throwing Obama and Obamacare into the briar patch he so desperately desires or at least needs.

I refer you to the following vanity:

No Time for Schadenfreude, Get out in Front Now