Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/25/2013 5:16:32 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]



click to enlarge

Figure 5. Decreasing hydrogen index (HI) contours show regions of increasing thermal maturity of New Albany Shale source rocks within the Illinois Basin. Contour interval is 50 HI. The 400 HI contour (red line) outlines the area of source rocks that are thermally mature for oil generation. Catchments are labeled clockwise from 1 to 7. Irregular dark-green line outlines the maximum extent of the New Albany Shale (modified from Lewan and others, 1995, 2002).

Figure 7. Generalized stratigraphic column of Devonian and Mississippian strata in the southern part of the Illinois Basin. Horizontal red lines to the right of the column indicate the primary oil and gas productive intervals. Shown are names and vertical and lateral associations of strata from Late Devonian to Late Mississippian time. The New Albany Shale hydrocarbon source rock is also labeled (Modified from Bell and others, 1961; Buschbach and Kolata, 1991, reprinted by permission of The American Association of Petroleum Geologists and AAPG Data Systems (Datapages, Inc.)


click to enlarge

Figure 8. This generalized southwest-northeast stratigraphic cross section of the Middle Devonian through Mississippian Kaskaskia sequence shows vertical and lateral extent of primary hydrocarbon source rock and reservoir rocks in the Illinois Basin (modified from Treworgy and Devera, 1991

Petroleum Production in the Basin

The Clark County Division field was drilled in the Illinois Basin in 1900; this is the first field that contains discovery date information in the PI/Dwights databases (1996, 1999) and Nehring database (1996).Average discovery date is 1946 for 320 fields in the databases that contain this information. The Illinois Basin has a mature exploration status. Macke (1996) estimated that 10 or fewer oil accumulations of 1 million barrels or greater remain to be discovered in Mississippian and Pennsylvanian formations in the basin and that remaining reserve growth will mainly result from secondary and tertiary methods of petroleum production from existing fields.The basin contains more than sixty different petroleum pay intervals that range in age from Ordovician to Pennsylvanian; production is primarily from structural traps at depths of less than 5,500 ft (1,675 m) (Howard and Whitaker, 1990). "A number of hydrocarbon occurrences are closely related to the tops of three major carbonate intervals"; these are listed by Howard (1991) as being the Upper Ordovician Ottowa Supergroup, the Silurian and Devonian Hunton Supergroup, and the Mississippian Valmeyeran Series. Most hydrocarbon production in the basin has been from siliciclastic intervals in Chesterian and Pennsylvanian rocks (Howard, 1991). Oltz and others (1991) determined that the Illinois Basin has almost 1,700 fields; these produce mainly oil from about 7,000 separate sandstone and carbonate reservoirs. Ninety-six percent of this production is stripper, or less than 10 BO/day per well; this percentage is six times greater than the national average for stripper production (Oltz and others, 1991). Organic geochemical correlations indicate that more than 99% of discovered petroleum in the basin was derived from the New Albany Shale (Hatch and others, 1991).

Almost 90,000 wells have been drilled in the Illinois Basin; 42%, or about 38,000 wells, are currently listed as oil and (or) gas productive (PI/Dwights WHCS data through Dec, 1996). Total number of dry holes across the basin is 47,800 (PI/Dwights WHCS database through 1996).Figure 4 shows distribution of oil and gas wells across the basin. Production is from Silurian-through Pennsylvanian-age reservoirs.

THE NEW ALBANY SHALE PETROLEUM SYSTEM, ILLINOIS BASIN – DATA AND MAP IMAGE ARCHIVE FROM THE MATERIAL-BALANCE ASSESSMENT
http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2003/ofr-03-037/htmltext/introduc.htm#DistOGD

2 posted on 10/25/2013 5:26:19 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 1010RD

New Albany Shale ping

A little more info


3 posted on 10/25/2013 5:27:08 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

“The New Albany is getting comparisons to the Elm Coulee Bakken of Montana, where production has already surpassed 120 million barrels of oil from horizontal wells. The two formations appear to be very familiar – similar in age, size, and in all likelihood, oil – but no two shale plays are exactly alike.”

At the risk of being called hysterically pessimistic, don’t believe all the hype about this or most other oil shale plays.

Physics does not allow liquids to move very well through such tight rock.

The only truly bonafide successes in more of a basin-wide oil shale play come from the Eagleford and the Bakken. Even then, most of the acreage in the Eagleford is not commercial, although one hears primarily about those wells that are. Same thing holds true in the Bakken.

Liquids sitting in a tight matrix rock cannot sensibly produce commercial oil by and large unless the rock is naturally fractured. It just takes too much capital to try to bust the rock up yourself. Nature has to do it.

The only oil shales that will be wide-spread commercially attractive are those that exhibit lots of natural fractures, or those not really oil but wet gas rich shales. Places like the Niobrara just have a good well every now and then, presumably only areas that have natural fractures. An illustration of how natural fractures are important is easy to see in the history of the Monterey or the Austin Chalk formation. It’s boom or bust by and large.

The real big US shale play is in gas, which moves much more easily through the crappy formations. An unlimited supply exists in this country.


10 posted on 10/25/2013 6:22:30 AM PDT by bestintxas (Anyone who votes for Obama after these 4 miserable years needs to take a mandatory citizenship test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

This is also coal country with much of it strip mined. I suspect the fracking would be extremely productive.


11 posted on 10/25/2013 7:41:17 AM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
If we don’t keep our ear to the ground, we could miss something big.

Ask the antis. They're probably out at the site protesting!

12 posted on 10/25/2013 7:49:26 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson