What is anti scientific about the article? The notion that because science readily admits it hasn’t figured out one thing, then all of geology, paleontology, cosmology, planetology, etc., is all wrong. Sorry, but science is all about identifying where you are wrong, and gathering evidence to come up with new ideas.
Quite. That one briefly described issue is not immediately understood does not totally dismantle the overall theory for which most such things make sense...and does not justify an alternate theory which fails to explain most obvious things like rock strata and fossils.
The “young earth” theory requires all history fit in just 100 hundred-year lifespans. What we plainly see and experience does not extrapolate to that short a span.
“The notion that because science readily admits it hasn’t figured out one thing,...”
Scientist know little about many things, therefore it is proper to question ideas and prove them.
And if they are wrong about this , they can be wrong about that.
Science has become a religion to some.
(in place of God)