Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rand Paul pushes constitutional amendment on Congress
Politico ^

Posted on 10/22/2013 5:48:25 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA

Forget the Vitter amendment. Rand Paul wants to make sure that Congress can’t ever again write laws with provisions specific to lawmakers. The Kentucky freshman Republican has introduced a constitutional amendment that would preclude senators and representatives from passing laws that don’t apply equally to U.S. citizens and Congress, the executive branch and the Supreme Court. The amendment is aimed squarely at Obamacare provisions specific to members of Congress and their staffs that became a central point of contention during the government shutdown.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 113th; obamacare; paul; rand; randpaul; standwithrand
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
Silly me, I had thought this was already the case.

Make it retroactive for obozocare.

1 posted on 10/22/2013 5:48:25 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Well I’m all for it. Rest assured they will add loop holes however...


2 posted on 10/22/2013 5:51:46 PM PDT by ransacked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Od8ckwad just needs to be impeached.


3 posted on 10/22/2013 5:52:01 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
and the Supreme Court

and john roberts FIRST...top of the list...

4 posted on 10/22/2013 5:52:12 PM PDT by OBXWanderer (I'm up against a hard break...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransacked

Rand Paul knows this will go over like a lead turd.

It hasn’t got a chance.


5 posted on 10/22/2013 5:52:51 PM PDT by Venturer (Keep Obama and you aint seen nothing yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

While I applaud Mr Paul for his sincere effort, we all know the self serving pricks will never vote for this.


6 posted on 10/22/2013 5:52:57 PM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransacked

It would be nice to see a simple vote tally for this. I mean, who could be against laws applied equally?


7 posted on 10/22/2013 5:53:15 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

At the very least, it will get the bastards on record.


8 posted on 10/22/2013 5:53:41 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

With whose votes?


9 posted on 10/22/2013 5:54:13 PM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Impeached, removed and 90% of wealth confiscated for refund.


10 posted on 10/22/2013 5:54:20 PM PDT by CommieCutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Even if such an amendment were to become part of our Constitution, it would be ignored by congress just like they do with the Constitution as it now stands.


11 posted on 10/22/2013 5:55:57 PM PDT by doc1019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Senator Rand Paul is going up against Senator Patty Murray,let’s see how he does.


12 posted on 10/22/2013 5:56:39 PM PDT by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
Silly me, I had thought this was already the case.

I am not a lawyer, nor am I a constitutional scholar (IOW, I'm as qualified to be President as Obastard, but I digress), but it surprises me there is not a clause somewhere in there to keep lawmakers from exempting themselves from their own laws.

13 posted on 10/22/2013 6:11:42 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (We're At That Awkward Stage: It's too late to vote them out, too early to shoot the bastards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
At the very least, it will get the bastards on record.

Exactly! It forces a response. Provided he gets support for his bill instead of nagging and whining.

14 posted on 10/22/2013 6:12:14 PM PDT by TigersEye (Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CommieCutter

Not enough....see tagline.


15 posted on 10/22/2013 6:13:04 PM PDT by Fireone (Impeach and imprison, NOW! Treason and murder are still crimes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Methinks Rand belies his own libertarian tendencies with this one.

Better solution would be to get FedGov back within the confines of the Constitution by eliminating the anti-Constitutional departments, bureaus, agencies, offices, and pogroms that serve no purpose than to provide fodder for the career paths of these elected elitists.


16 posted on 10/22/2013 6:23:06 PM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2016; I pray we make it that long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Ted Cruz just proved there are more important things than winning every battle. Rand Paul is just trying to get McQueeg to call him a “Wacko-Bird” again. That’s paydirt for conservative votes.

(As an aside, I’d like to ponder something: Where did the addle-brained, addle-pated old coot ever get the term “Wacko-Bird?” I think it’s the politician’s disease, where they have to be trendy, even if they’re a senile crank. At the time of the utterance of that piece of voice-vomit, the hand-held video game craze was “Angry Birds.” I think Captain Queeg wanted to be hip and run with that, but decided at the last second “Angry” was too nice, so he changed it to “Wacko.” That or he simply forgot what his bloated female offspring told him. No other explanations make sense.)


17 posted on 10/22/2013 6:23:19 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (We're At That Awkward Stage: It's too late to vote them out, too early to shoot the bastards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PubliusMM
Better solution would be to get FedGov back within the confines of the Constitution ...

Don't you think forcing Congress to live within the laws they write for the rest of us is a means to that end? I would think a king would be a little less likely to send officers among us to eat out our substance if his was being eaten out as well.

18 posted on 10/22/2013 6:26:58 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (We're At That Awkward Stage: It's too late to vote them out, too early to shoot the bastards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

>>>it surprises me there is not a clause somewhere in there to keep lawmakers from exempting themselves from their own laws.

Lawmakers, in their brashness, claim the opposite... That by exempting themselves from federal law that they are, in fact, protecting the Constitutional separation of powers, by preventing the executive branch from controlling their actions through executive-branch-enforcement of laws.

I could see where that might make sense if we were talking about laws about making laws (meta-law?), but not about your garden variety legislation like ObamaCare.


19 posted on 10/22/2013 6:28:52 PM PDT by XEHRpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

It would be nice to see a simple vote tally for this. I mean, who could be against laws applied equally?

Which is why this will never come to a vote.


20 posted on 10/22/2013 6:30:34 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson