I agree, but Barack Obama was a vasty weaker candidate than she is, except the gopE wanted to elect BO more than the dems.
“...but Barack Obama was a vasty weaker candidate than she is, except the gopE wanted to elect BO more than the dems.”
This gets to my point about Hillary being easy to beat. Obama was certainly a weaker candidate, but he was far more articulate and charismatic. (I think this also applies to a lesser extent to Romney’s defeat.) I think those of us who pay attention to the issues can forget how many voters out there are largely swayed by a candidate’s “star quality”, something which Hillary sorely lacks.
Screeched: “What difference does it make?”