Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick

I agree whole-heartedly.....Attacking breast-feeding is just another attack on the traditional family.


86 posted on 10/20/2013 1:31:56 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: dfwgator

There’s just so much wrong with this. A stay-at-home mother may not know anyone who can keep her child for a whole day, or come with her to court. Other women have jobs or their own children. Teenagers are at school. For many years, I either took all my children someplace, or I stayed home.

I even considered having a home birth because it was so hard to figure out what to do with the other children when I went to the hospital. (My husband went to the Knights of Columbus and said, “HELP!”)

A baby who is used to nursing may not take a bottle. Is she supposed to go 8 or 10 hours without eating, while in the care of a stranger? A nursing mother can’t just turn off milk production, and if she’s been at home with her baby, she may not have a breast pump or bottles. I didn’t with most of my children. I was given some bottles before my most recent baby was born, but never used them. (When Kathleen started using a cup, I gave the bottles to a crisis-pregnancy center.)

It would have been reasonable for Ms. Trickle (and then she named her *daughter* “Axel,” good gravy) to take care of her baby in the jury-pool room. A 5-month-old is very little trouble and would have given the rest of the jurors something fun to do.

(Sorry to rant at you ... I haz a tiny enraged over this!)


93 posted on 10/20/2013 1:47:51 PM PDT by Tax-chick ("The heart of the matter is God's love. It always has been. It always will be."~Abp. Chaput)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson