Pretty sure we have already seen this but it probably bears repeating. The answer is leaderless counter revolution. Interesting times ahead. Buckle up and keep the popcorn handy.
“The answer is leaderless counter revolution.”
Which is what the TEA party really was. Keep in mind that having a leader is to draw a target on one person or a small group. That is what has proved so vexing for the opposition: there are few prominent individuals for them to target alinsky style.
I think the author, though, is going further. Not so much leaderless groups as leaderless individuals.