Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Grams A
Revolt, dictatorship or take over by outside forces?

To answer that question, you'd need to know who is calling the shots for Obama.

For purpose of discussion, let's stipulate that Valerie Jarrett is, in fact, Obama's "controller". This has been often rumored and I'm prepared to accept that it's true. My reading of Obama is that a.) he's not particularly smart and b.) he's lazy. Accordingly, the agenda that is being pursued hasn't been authored by him but, by virtue of his raising and his training, he's certainly in agreement with it.

So, somebody is "running" him. That being Jarrett.

But who's running her?

Remember that Blackberry that Obama refused to surrender upon being elected President? The one that the National Archives grudgingly let him keep, even though it wasn't tied into the White House network -- so there would be no record of who he talked to and what was discussed (as there is of every other Presidential phone conversation). Wouldn't you like to know who is on the other end of that Blackberry?

My own working theory is that:

a. Both Obama and Jarrett are of the Chicago cell of domestic Communists. A group that includes (or has included): William Ayers (and his father), Valerie Jarrett's husband and father-in-law, David Axelrod (and his parents), Michael Kronsky (and other Ayers followers from the Weather Underground), Frank Marshall Davis, Saul Alinsky et cetera.

b. Starting in the eighties, the funding that the cell received from the KGB began to dry up as the Soviets realized they were losing the Cold War. The cell began searching for a new source of funds and found one in the Radical Islamists (e.g., Muslim Brotherhood). Both the Communists and the Islamists had been busily agitating in the black community, recruiting allies. Vernon Jarrett was one of these who was plugged into both groups. Brotherhood money started replacing Soviet money in the Chicago Cell -- but there was a price to be paid.

c. Eventually, it was agreed that, were they able to subvert the U.S. and install a leader under their control that the Communists would set the domestic agenda while the Brotherhood would control foreign policy.

And here we are...

This explanation accurately reflects history...plus it explains the strangely bifurcated approach the regime has to domestic policy and foreign policy.

I confess, though, that I have no idea exactly who it is on the other end of that phone. Or who is giving directions to Jarrett.

But I suspect we have enough context to answer your question...

98 posted on 10/20/2013 9:49:24 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: okie01

But who’s running her?


Leo Gerard


99 posted on 10/20/2013 10:45:41 PM PDT by Despot of the Delta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson