Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zeestephen
Romney did much better than McCain in suburban areas and white urban areas. McCain - despite an even worse campaign than Romney - did better in rural areas. It evened out some, but that's not good enough to win.

I grew up near Roscommon. Roscommon County is a swing rural working class county in North Michigan that votes either way due to a mix of union cards and social conservatism. In 2008, Obama got 7082 votes and McCain 6727. In 2012, Romney 6701 and Obama 6198. Buyers remorse for Obama, but Romney did worse than McCain. Bush had 7364 votes.

MANY rural counties are similar, especially in the Midwest. Percentages sometimes mask the actual vote total.

38 posted on 10/19/2013 3:27:08 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (Abortion - legalized murder for convenience)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Darren McCarty
I think I missed your main point earlier.

The TOTAL white vote went down in 2012, so Romney's results are less impressive than they appear at first glance.

However, Obama’s share of the white vote went down by 4% in 2012, and Romney's share went up 4%, so it does seem to balance out.

Also, Romney did much better with men than McCain, but McCain did better with women.

Here's the 2008 link:

http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/elections/how_groups_voted/voted_08.html

Here's the 2012 link:

http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/elections/how_groups_voted/voted_12.html

40 posted on 10/19/2013 5:38:27 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson