Posted on 10/15/2013 10:31:59 AM PDT by Academiadotorg
Hear what? I agree the OP was wrong to not post the entire article. I’ll repeat that as many times as needed.
I have not seen a policy that the blog-police are above criticism. For example, many of blog-police initial responses now simply question if the OP is making money and neglect to even mention the infraction was excerpting. Any site visitor not familiar with FR simply see the jerk behavior. If the blog-police would at least cite the infraction, it would be a step back towards serving the role mentioned in the policy.
To preempt “they can post what they want!”... so can I.
Previous post was a reply to you, not sure why it tagged it to me.
You have a nice day.
I laughed at post 36.
Many times, I’m as interested in the FR member replies as much (or more) than the original article. When the trolling goes past the first few posts in the thread, it dilutes the content that is there and kills the discussion that is valued by this community.
I don’t have a blog... No plans for one... Not associated with any blog. Obviously, the blog police managed to annoy at least one person who isn’t a blogger.
Soon to visit us in America.
Thank you!
Thank you!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.