Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Huelskamp: White House Is ‘Fear Mongering’ on Debt Limit
rollcall.com ^ | October 13, 2013 | Matt Fuller

Posted on 10/13/2013 7:48:32 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

Dozens of economists have warned that a failure by Congress to raise the debt ceiling could have catastrophic economic consequences, but Rep. Tim Huelskamp continues to read the situation differently.

Asked on Saturday about the effect of Congress not raising the debt limit, the Kansas Republican said Moody’s Investors Service does not think the debt limit will have a major impact on the economy.

“That is not what Moody’s says,” Huelskamp said.

“Have you read the report?” he asked after being challenged by reporters. “They said ‘absolutely no impact on Oct. 17.’ I read the report! I just read it last night, give me your email address. I’ll send it to you.”

As another reporter began asking a question, Huelskamp added: “Do not agree with what the president is telling you. Fear mongering.”

What Moody’s said was the Treasury Department would likely continue paying interest on the government’s debt with incoming revenue even if the debt limit was breached. The problem may be semantics. Moody’s memo basically says the U.S. would not be in a technical default situation, if as they predict, the government continues to service the debt.

But Moody’s Chief Economist Mark Zandi has said the economic effect of failing to raise the debt limit would be “an unmitigated catastrophe.”

Asked about the memo on CNN, Zandi said:

“I’m not part of the rating agency, so that’s from a different part of my organization. In my view, if the U.S. government does not make a payment, either whether it be on U.S. Treasury debt, that would certainly be a default. If it didn’t make its payments on other obligations, in my view, that would be a default in anything perhaps but name, be almost semantic, clearly either way, it would be very hard on the economy and it would be the prescription for a very deep recession.”

The memo was part of a larger document, but its relevant section — titled “United States Government Shutdown and Debt Limit: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions,” which can be found here on page 27 — made its way around Capitol Hill this week. Many Republicans have touted it as a refutation to the White House and the Treasury Department’s claim that exceeding the nation’s borrowing authority would be, as White House Press Secretary Jay Carney put it Friday, “catastrophically damaging to the economy and the American people.”

Moody’s does suggest, as others have, that Oct. 17 might not be the hard-and-fast deadline for debt default.

Regardless of what the Treasury Department can do, investors on Wall Street have already shown that they are likely to have a pessimistic reaction if Congress fails to raise the debt ceiling this week.

But a number of House Republicans have made comments recently that a debt default would not be so bad, and many seem to think the Moody’s memo is a license to go over. Huelskamp seems to be just the latest in a crowd.

CQ Roll Call later sought clarification from Huelskamp on whether he actually meant there would be no economic effects come Oct. 17 if the debt limit is not raised; he made his position quite clear.

“Actually, that’s what Moody’s says, son,” Huelskamp said.

Pressed on the effect a default would have a on the stock market, Huelskamp was unfazed.

“It went up, it goes down, it moves around, and, you know,” Huelskamp said.

Further pressed for clarification, Huelskamp seemed to suggest the White House was responsible for whatever impact a debt default would have on the stock market.

“Depends how well [Treasury Secretary Jacob J.] Lew does his job, which is to fear monger, which is what he did on five Sunday weekend shows,” Huelskamp said. “He went around and warned people, says, ‘Gosh, the world will end on October 17. Moody’s disagrees. [Vice President] Joe Biden disagrees, which is why they don’t want Joe Biden in the room.”

Asked if he felt the administration had “overplayed” the potential effects of not extending the debt limit, Huelskamp was unequivocal.

“Overplayed? They have misled folks, just like they did on Aug. 2 when they had $65 billion cash on hand and, as Joe Biden said on Aug. 21, 2011, ‘We’re not going to default.’ And so you ought to play that,” Huelskamp said. “But you know, you notice you haven’t heard from Joe Biden in a while on these things.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: kansas; naivety

1 posted on 10/13/2013 7:48:33 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Apparently debt is not a bad thing anymore. The real boogeyman is limits on debt. Democrats can sell a liberal’s children into slavery and liberals will cheer them on.


2 posted on 10/13/2013 7:53:11 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Maybe Rep Huelskamp has read this excellent essay by Newt Gringrich: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3078524/posts?page=1


3 posted on 10/13/2013 7:55:16 PM PDT by upchuck (nobamacare must be stopped before it can live down to our expectations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

What happens on Oct 17? A balanced budget.


4 posted on 10/13/2013 7:55:46 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Hey, of course the Democrats are scare mongering! That is their best attribute!

The shame of it all is that I wish that the Republicans will stand fast and force the Democrats to do just that! If Reid continues to want it all, give it to him! I’ve had it up to here about a real default - won’t happen. It is just another scare tactic by the left and they really need to be called on it! Reid needs to be GONE!

Yes, I give a damn about the global consequentions at this point. Let the Democrats explain it to them.


5 posted on 10/13/2013 8:04:19 PM PDT by Deagle (m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
I believe QE is the only thing keeping the gigantic bankers and their banks afloat. This being said, then the end of QE infinity would surely be financially catastrophic for those who live by the bank, for the bank, and of the bank.
6 posted on 10/13/2013 8:06:09 PM PDT by urbanpovertylawcenter (the law and poverty collide in an urban setting and sparks fly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Average monthly federal revenues: $200 billion.

Average monthly debt service: $20 billion.

Default? Not on debt, unless it’s by choice.


7 posted on 10/13/2013 8:09:02 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (....Let It Burn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Wolf.


8 posted on 10/13/2013 8:23:05 PM PDT by Red Dog #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

On Oct 18, China does not get the first oreo out of the bag. They can ration the dough so there is no default. They will have to kill military spending and thousands and thousands of government service contracts.


9 posted on 10/13/2013 8:30:15 PM PDT by FlyingEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deagle

0bama and Reid are conducting a wildcat strike.
Time to lock them out, and vote on back to work legislation

Some kind of alternative to how Regan handled the Air Traffic Controllers


10 posted on 10/13/2013 8:43:07 PM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FlyingEagle

The Feds have to maintain a Navy (per Constitution)

Everything else that is not in the Constitution -Buh Bye


11 posted on 10/13/2013 8:45:24 PM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FlyingEagle

Please explain this to me in numbers I can understand.

Let’s say the US debt is $1,000 with interest payments of $10. We bring in $50 a month. Why would anything have to be cut? Aren’t we bringing in $50 a month now?


12 posted on 10/13/2013 10:05:35 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson