Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lowbridge

I would think there would be legal repercussions for this type of statement.

There’s no statute of limitations on murder.

Or is that another of those legal details that only apply to the little people?


15 posted on 10/12/2013 9:53:52 AM PDT by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Steely Tom
I would think there would be legal repercussions for this type of statement. There’s no statute of limitations on murder.

My thoughts too.
35 posted on 10/12/2013 10:16:58 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Steely Tom

“There’s no statute of limitations on murder.”

If what Nichols says is true (and I kinda doubt it is), he’s got the very best protection from prosecution possible: any case against him would have to include an investigation, sworn testimony, discovery and the like, any of which could endanger the Clintons (again, if what Nichols said is true).

And the one fact of life we all know is that *nothing* that endangers the Clintons (or the Obamas) is ever seriously pursued.


119 posted on 10/12/2013 1:58:58 PM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson