But wait, we have heard stories here on how many of Obama’s FB/Twitter followers are fake. This is an MO of his. He relishes using the fluidity of digital data to create a false impression of numerical support. Why could this not be the same sort of thing, at least it part? Fake sign-ins, followed by deletions, run not from outside users, but insiders running code? Politically, it is essential to come up with orders of magnitude more applicants than a mere 5000. When I heard the 51,000 number being kicked around, I wondered how that could be. But this, plus the registration versus enrollment distinction mentioned elsewhere, begins to make sense of it. Not saying its definitely so, just saying there was motive, means, and opportunity.
fluidity of data......
Similar to how they funded the reelection campaign - not using the credit card donor address verification feature.
Supposedly, the campaign was going to verify that the donors were legitimate, after the funds were processed.
I’ll bet after the elections some sort of “bravo sierra” made confirmation impossible.
fluidity of data......
Similar to how they funded the reelection campaign - not using the credit card donor address verification feature.
Supposedly, the campaign was going to verify that the donors were legitimate, after the funds were processed.
I’ll bet after the elections some sort of “bravo sierra” made confirmation impossible.