Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gov. Brown: Insurers Must Cover Fertility Treatments—For Same-Sex Partners
Cybercast News Service ^ | October 10, 2013 - 2:33 PM | Barbara Hollingsworth

Posted on 10/11/2013 8:27:34 AM PDT by Olog-hai

Starting next January, health insurance plans in California must offer coverage for fertility treatments to homosexual couples and unmarried individuals under a new law signed by Gov. Jerry Brown on Tuesday.

The law amends the state’s Insurance Code to prohibit insurers from withholding coverage for most fertility treatments based on “age, ancestry, color, disability, domestic partner status, gender, gender expression, gender identity, genetic information, marital status, national origin, sex or sexual orientation.” …

A.B.460 was introduced by Assemblyman Tom Ammiano, a San Franciso Democrat and LGBT rights activist who portrayed himself in a film starring Sean Penn about the murder of openly gay San Francisco Supervisor Harvey Milk by a disgruntled former supervisor.

“To restrict fertility coverage solely to heterosexual married couples violates California’s non-discrimination laws. I wrote this bill to correct that,” Ammiano said in a statement praising Brown for signing the legislation. …

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: fertilitytreatment; homosexualagenda; jerrybrown; lgbt; lofan; nannystate; obamacare

1 posted on 10/11/2013 8:27:34 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

There may come a time when families will be required to help same sex couples with their reproductive needs. Sadly I could see it happening.


2 posted on 10/11/2013 8:29:42 AM PDT by KSCITYBOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Mental illness can be ugly and sad.


3 posted on 10/11/2013 8:30:34 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule the all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
This is what you get when you mix third party pays health care and politicians. No third party payer system is workable if politicians involve themselves. Since politicians will always involve themselves, no such system can ever work on an ongoing basis. Cash and carry is the only long term stable system for delivering health care.
4 posted on 10/11/2013 8:36:03 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Is John's moustache long enough YET?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I don’t understand, Doctor. We’ve been having sex every day, but he does not seem to be getting pregnant...


5 posted on 10/11/2013 8:36:27 AM PDT by Rebel_Ace (Tags?!? Tags?!? We don' neeeed no stinkin' Tags!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Note to Gov. Moonbeam: 1 male + 1 female = 1 child; 1 male + 1 male = 0 child; 1 female + 1 female = 0 child. It is called simple biology.

Now, using technology to create a child for a homosexual couple should not be covered by tax dollars. Let the LBGT crowd pay for their perversions.

6 posted on 10/11/2013 8:42:54 AM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

This is beyond stupid. If you want kids, marry someone of the opposite sex and try the correct method first.


7 posted on 10/11/2013 8:44:31 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

‘Can’t get out of this looney bin soon enough.


8 posted on 10/11/2013 8:44:40 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

If there is a campaign against the Laws of God and Nature, California is leading the charge. It looks like Brown is bucking for High Priest of the Amalekites. This type of law shows liberalism is more than just a mental disorder. It is a rebellion against God forcing the faithful to comply or face punishment.


9 posted on 10/11/2013 8:56:58 AM PDT by trubolotta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“To restrict fertility coverage solely to heterosexual married couples violates California’s non-discrimination laws. I wrote this bill to correct that,”

Hell. In. A. Handbasket.


10 posted on 10/11/2013 8:58:38 AM PDT by jagusafr (the American Trinity (Liberty, In G0D We Trust, E Pluribus Unum))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“A.B.460 was introduced by Assemblyman Tom Ammiano (MF-SF).”

A lot of VERY bad legislation comes from this Bay Area jerk.


11 posted on 10/11/2013 9:03:57 AM PDT by Bon of Babble (Don't want to brag...but I can still fit into the earrings I wore in high school!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Well, I don't think there are very many insurance companies that cover Fertility treatments even for Heterosexual couples. This will put the nail in the coffin for those few that do offer coverage.
12 posted on 10/11/2013 9:10:36 AM PDT by martinidon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
“To restrict fertility coverage solely to heterosexual married couples violates California’s non-discrimination laws.

Boy, God sure is a bigot, isn't He?

13 posted on 10/11/2013 9:12:51 AM PDT by Nea Wood (When life gets too hard to stand, kneel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I read this and it reinforced the fact that the government in california is even more evil than the fedgov.

They’re NUTS!


14 posted on 10/11/2013 9:27:12 AM PDT by 43north (BHO: 50% black, 50% white, 100% RED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Earth is no longer my planet.


15 posted on 10/11/2013 9:46:42 AM PDT by Gator113 (Ted Cruz is settled law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I’m thinking they just need to try harder.


16 posted on 10/11/2013 9:50:27 AM PDT by dangerdoc (see post #6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All


Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


17 posted on 10/11/2013 9:53:01 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: martinidon
Obamacare may require Insurance companies to cover fertility treatments. I am not sure. It does require contraception be covered, regardless of religious objections.
18 posted on 10/11/2013 9:53:02 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai; SheLion; Eric Blair 2084; -YYZ-; 31R1O; 383rr; AFreeBird; AGreatPer; Alamo-Girl; Alia; ...

LGBT Nanny State PING!


19 posted on 10/12/2013 7:54:58 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Major brain damage at UMES, but no property damage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Thanks for the ping!


20 posted on 10/12/2013 8:26:23 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson