Right Beck:
You can't prove either one of those assertions.
This (linked) article wasn’t written by Beck.
If Obama was a natural born US Citizen why would the DNC go to such trouble to leave out the qualifiying constitutional language in the DNC nomination certifications sent to 40 of the 50 states.
The DNC drafted, signed and notarized TWO slightly different versions of their Official Certification of Nomination documents, not one.
One of those documents had complete legal language, and one of them was missing the text concerning the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama.
The version which is absent any certification of constitutional standing for the office of President is the version that the DNC filed with every state in the country except Hawaii. However, the one the DNC files in Hawaii had the qualifying constitutional language IN the document!
Curiously, the State of Hawaii Nomination Certification that the Hawaii Democratic Committee filed with the state presenting Hawaii's certification of Obama's eligibility did NOT contain the constitutional qualifying language.
Why would the DNC and the Hawaii Democratic Committee go to such trouble to present false documents if Obama was constitutionally qualified?
Beck is missing the mark on this issue.
This is an article by Wayne Allen Root.