Skip to comments.
Why the Wyoming Senate race is like nothing you’ve seen before
washingtonpost.com ^
| 10/7/13
| Sean Sullivan
Posted on 10/09/2013 1:14:44 PM PDT by cotton1706
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Enzi's voting record (none available for Cheney):
Enzi (WY) - 2014 - 78% (Average) - 73% (Heritage) - 71% (CFG) - 92% (ACU) - 77% (FreedomWorks)
To: cotton1706
Enzi (WY) - 2014 - 78% (Average) - 73% (Heritage) - 71% (CFG) - 92% (ACU) - 77% (FreedomWorks)
If you cannot average 80%+ (subtracting out the Trojan Horse ACU), you ain't a conservative.
2
posted on
10/09/2013 1:17:25 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
That having been said, I don’t like Cheney either.
3
posted on
10/09/2013 1:17:57 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
“I dont like Cheney either.”
And that’s the conundrum!
To: SoConPubbie
I have supported Lynn Cheney in this race not out of overwhelming passion but out of the principle that we ought to summarily execute a few examples to encourage the others.
5
posted on
10/09/2013 1:20:24 PM PDT
by
nathanbedford
("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
To: cotton1706
Democrats wield little to no power in the ruby red state.Is it a coincidence that Wyoming is one of the best governed most fiscally sound states in the union? I think not.
6
posted on
10/09/2013 1:20:38 PM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: FReepers; Patriots; FRiends
7
posted on
10/09/2013 1:20:52 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: cotton1706
Dick Cheney always seemed reliably conservative to me. He and Rumsfeld were on the right side of Bush, with Powell and Rice on the left. Conservative and isolationist are not the same thing. Rand’s isolationism is very much a stock libertarian viewpoint and has nothing to do with conservatism in the foreign policy arena as exemplified by Ronald Reagan.
8
posted on
10/09/2013 1:30:51 PM PDT
by
JediJones
(The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
To: cotton1706
Romney team member Liz Cheney is in some ways more open about her liberalism, she has openly supported gay marriage for years, like Romney she has always been for homosexualizing the military, but she was so gay marriage the she opposed both DOMA AND a constitutional amendment to protect marriage.
She has refused to ever utter a pro-life position until for this campaign, in which she has gone total Romney and now proclaims a NEW Liz Cheney.
The homosexual agenda? Pro-abortion? No thanks.
9
posted on
10/09/2013 1:35:10 PM PDT
by
ansel12
To: nathanbedford
Is it Barasso she is running against. Nuke that quisling.
10
posted on
10/09/2013 1:40:07 PM PDT
by
ez
(Muslims do not play well with others.)
To: nathanbedford
I am supporting Senator Pat Roberts opponent for essentially the same reason.
Senator Roberts graduated from Kansas State University in 1958 and entered the Marine Corps. After getting out of the service, he became a journalist in Arizona. He then became an Admin Assistant to Congressman Sebelius of Western Kansas in 1969. Since that date, he has lived and worked in the Washington area making periodic visits to Kansas to kiss babies and pat the peasants on the head.
Yes, Congressman Sebelius is Kathleen Sebelius’ father in law.
To: Vigilanteman
To: JediJones
when did Reagan start a war based on faulty intelligence, for which he had no exit strategy, nor plan to pay for it?
To: JediJones
Nicely stated— thank you.
14
posted on
10/09/2013 1:43:36 PM PDT
by
pierrem15
(Claudius: "Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out.")
To: JediJones
Dick Cheney always seemed reliably conservative to me. Supporting homosexualizing the military and the homosexual agenda in general shows a lack of understanding of all things conservative.
He can be on the right side of many issues or situations, but fundamentally he isn't so deeply conservative.
15
posted on
10/09/2013 1:44:16 PM PDT
by
ansel12
To: ez
16
posted on
10/09/2013 1:46:29 PM PDT
by
nathanbedford
("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
To: nathanbedford
I have supported Lynn Cheney in this race not out of overwhelming passion but out of the principle that we ought to summarily execute a few examples to encourage the others.
I like the way you think! :)
17
posted on
10/09/2013 1:46:50 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: JediJones
"He and Rumsfeld were on the right side of Bush, with Powell and Rice on the left"
He and Rumsfeld are NeoCons while Powell and Rice are Realists.
GOP presidents usually appoint NeoCons to SecDef and Realists to SecState and NSA.
Dem presidents usually appoint Realists to SecDef and NSA and Liberal Interventionists to SecState.
To: nathanbedford
“pour encourager les autres”?
To: nathanbedford
Thx. Waiting for Barasso to get his.
20
posted on
10/09/2013 2:13:00 PM PDT
by
ez
(Muslims do not play well with others.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson