Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GreyFriar
I don’t remember the context though it could have been about the legality of a national bank that he opposed

Maybe this was what you were thinking of?

Trail of Tears

Indian Removal Act

48 posted on 10/07/2013 3:16:23 PM PDT by itsahoot (It is not so much that history repeats, but that human nature does not change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: itsahoot

That is closer than I was with the national bank:

Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 515 (1832), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court vacated the conviction of Samuel Worcester and held that the Georgia criminal statute that prohibited non-Native Americans from being present on Native American lands without a license from the state was unconstitutional.

The opinion is most famous for its dicta, which lay out the relationship between tribes and the state and federal governments, building the foundations of the doctrine of tribal sovereignty in the United States.


52 posted on 10/07/2013 5:40:56 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson