Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625
Vinson, of San Jose, will pay $1,800 more a year for an individual policy, while Waschura, of Portola Valley, will cough up almost $10,000 more for insurance for his family of four.

But they get enough free birth control for anyone, no matter how "active" in return for that $1800 or $10k. Free is good. That has to count for something.

9 posted on 10/07/2013 9:28:19 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pollster1
But they get enough free birth control for anyone, no matter how "active" in return for that $1800 or $10k. Free is good. That has to count for something.

I was explaining this to a friend. He says "Wait, women over 50 have to have insurance that covers maternity?", and I tell him "Yep, the only way they make enough money is if they got lots of people paying for stuff they will be unlikely to use".

21 posted on 10/07/2013 10:56:56 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Pollster1

look, if anyone needs us to pay for her birth control, it’s that ridiculous fluck (or whatever) woman. we should all be able to agree that draining her gene pool ASAP is for the best.


26 posted on 10/07/2013 1:45:17 PM PDT by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson