To: PapaBear3625
Vinson, of San Jose, will pay $1,800 more a year for an individual policy, while Waschura, of Portola Valley, will cough up almost $10,000 more for insurance for his family of four. But they get enough free birth control for anyone, no matter how "active" in return for that $1800 or $10k. Free is good. That has to count for something.
9 posted on
10/07/2013 9:28:19 AM PDT by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: Pollster1
But they get enough free birth control for anyone, no matter how "active" in return for that $1800 or $10k. Free is good. That has to count for something. I was explaining this to a friend. He says "Wait, women over 50 have to have insurance that covers maternity?", and I tell him "Yep, the only way they make enough money is if they got lots of people paying for stuff they will be unlikely to use".
21 posted on
10/07/2013 10:56:56 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
(You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
To: Pollster1
look, if anyone needs us to pay for her birth control, it’s that ridiculous fluck (or whatever) woman. we should all be able to agree that draining her gene pool ASAP is for the best.
26 posted on
10/07/2013 1:45:17 PM PDT by
JohnBrowdie
(http://forum.stink-eye.net)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson