Posted on 10/07/2013 4:12:27 AM PDT by Kaslin
It’s hard to conceal carry in hemp clothing.
Exercising your Constitutional rights is “showing off”?
Sad to see this on a site where people supposedly love the Constitution. Disgusting is more apt a term.
Only a matter of time before this happens again now that the environment is being created by Howard Schultz.
3 Employees Killed At D.C. Starbucks (Flashback- DC; 1997; Gun Free Zone)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3068749/posts
No...specifically going to Starbucks to use it as a stage IS “showing off”.
Do you understand the difference between “exercising” and “flaunting”?
That’s funny. Do you think Starbucks would ban Transgenders if they flaunted themselves at Starbucks? I don’t think they would....not even for a second. Hence the blatant hypocrisy which you miss entirely.
Introducing an irrelevant theoretical doesn’t mean that I’m wrong about open carry folks using Starbucks as a stage, or the owner’s right to object.
Why do you believe he’s obligated to provide you with a stage for ANYTHING?
Some did. No argument here. BUT SOME ALWAYS WILL. That is no excuse for banning everyone for the actions of a few.
NOBODY has been “banned”!
He “asked” folks not to.
If you bring a gun into a store when the owner has asked you not to, in PA you can be charged with criminal trespass.
So yes, that is in fact a de facto ban.
While the local Caribou Coffee is changing over to its new owners, I continue to carry in Starbucks.
It is about going home at the end of the day!
So do your open carry someplace else and quit looking for a stage!
You are not owed a stage by anybody.
request is request.
he did not make a policy.
so anyone can still legally ccw.
See Post 29.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.