To: grundle
Why not $280,000,000 per month?
8 posted on
10/05/2013 8:48:08 PM PDT by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
yes indeedy, why not? let’s not be stingy. why hold back? who cares about budgets? we’re talking about a human right here.
who are these people to limit a human right to $2800 a month?
14 posted on
10/05/2013 9:15:52 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Why not $280,000,000 per month?Because anything over $240,000,000 per month is just plain silly.
27 posted on
10/06/2013 4:20:27 AM PDT by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson