Ted Cruz hasn’t ever won a “national” election. He won a statewide election.
I’m not suggesting surrender, I’m simply suggesting that something a lot more subtle than a Ted Cruz would be necessary to win at the national level. Ted Cruz is far too polarizing. He would bring out the opposition in droves. He scares the living crap out of the low information voters, (with the help of the Progressive MSM) and all they’ll be told is that Cruz will take away their food stamps, their unemployment checks and their Obama phones.
Like I said, sit down, shut up and go vote for Bob Dole again.
We we run someone like him the Democrats will see we are sincere about not being mean to them.
The RINO’s have been asking the party to surrender to Obama the whole time, it is what they want.
subtle doesn’t win these battles, leftists don’t do subtle
You’re telling us your thoughts on what we can’t do.
What is your plan?
What have you done to win elections?
We have a pretty good record. What’s yours?
You know, I am sick to death of hearing this kind of quisling crap. By all means, let's ditch a true leader like Ted Cruz and stick with the mild-mannered vanilla types who won't offend anyone---like Mitt Romney. Because he worked out SO WELL, didn't he? Yes...."subtlety" is what's needed when the Constitution is being trashed and the country destroyed. /s
We need a moderate voice who WON'T bring out the opposition, who will send us on to victory, as so many moderates have before. /s
No more support from me for your subtle, non-polarizing types. In times of great evil, great leadership is called for, and if you can't recognize Cruz as juat that, you have a problem.
Those who are attacking Ted Cruz don’t belong in the party, they are playing for the other team.
That means we have to nominate Mitt Romney. No wait, we did and he got his ASS BEAT,and he had ALL the money($1 billion dollars)
Yeah right, MCcain and McConnell have done such a bang up job.
Douche anyone that has been there over two terms.