I disagree on that one Pen.....legally her car was seen as a weapon and she had shown clearly she was using it as so....’prior to’ the videos popular right now she had already thrown a police officer over her hood using her car to ram over him. But moreso who was to know this vehicle wasn’t carrying a bomb.
I do not buy into just because a child was in the vehicle this was enough to prevent them from firing....it was already clear they had refrained taking her out prior... further she was clocked at over 80 miles an hour and her destination would have put all alarms up , armed and ready.
This is the Capital and any who live there know well you’ll get a gun in your face real fast if you act up...it has always been so.
Had it been any other President in office I would be fine with how this was handled. But we all have opinions on this matter.
PARK RANGER: 'We've been told to make life as difficult for people as we can. It's disgusting'... http://drudge.tw/1dZCtFu
http://p.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/oct/3/pruden-the-cheap-tricks-of-the-game/
Ranger says they were told to make it as painful as possible , says its disgusting...
I can totally respect that point of view too. I don’t think my view would change depending on president though. Our police forces all over the country are becoming too militarized. While DC may be a special circumstance, it still doesn’t make sense that they would not have tried to stun gun her when she stepped out of car. Shooting a driver like that would not diffuse a potential car bomb. I respect your view though. The whole thing is beyond sad.