Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: donmeaker

The AFN broadcasts are overseas, where there isn’t any competition in English. Unless you live in Britain. I remember when there was only 1 AFN channel in Germany and if you lived more than a couple of miles from the transmitter, you couldn’t receive it.


9 posted on 10/03/2013 3:13:10 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: GreyFriar

AFN is a dinosaur. It has always sucked, but, back in the day, sucking beat nothing.

Today, you can get almost anything online and there is really no need for it. As a comm troop, I can tell you AFN ain’t what’s on soldier’s personal computers.


10 posted on 10/03/2013 3:23:56 PM PDT by antidisestablishment (Mahound delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: GreyFriar

I suppose that is the point:

With AFN providing rotten service, there is no incentive for a private company to provide better service.

Certanly overseas companies are capable of running a radio station in English.


15 posted on 10/03/2013 3:51:47 PM PDT by donmeaker (The lessons of Weimar are soon to be relearned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson