[donmeaker]

That would be post 300.

If you are not going to read them, why would I respond to your foolishness?

[ansel12]

If I had my way, there would be the government ‘civil union’ with various tax rules and ‘marriage’ as a religious sacrament. Marriage should be up to the religion. Once could be married without civil union (say plural marriage for Fundamentalist Mormons or Muslims). One could be civilly united without marriage (atheists, agnostics, or unions that don’t meet the religious requirements of marriage for any sect you may name). Or one could be married with a civil union. That would get the government out of the marriage business, but limit their authority to tax matters.

I read that and responded to it.

That isn't a political position, it is merely a personal fantasy, a childish wish, it isn't part of any political reality, or adult political discussion on our current political positions and law making.

We are fighting gay marriage right now, fighting the gaying of the military, and you have devoted yourself to defending the homosexual agenda on this thread.