Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jboot

A very reasonable position. I’m a libertarian who does not have a problem with drugs (including pot) continuing to be illegal as long as (1) the determination is at the state not the federal level, and (2) we return to non “war” law enforcement (no military weapons and tactics, no asset confiscation).


230 posted on 10/01/2013 9:04:21 AM PDT by Notary Sojac (Mi tio es enfermo, pero la carretera es verde!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]


Another libertarian benefit:

There may be freedom of certain people (government workers) to unionize, but there is also freedom of certain people (the taxpayers, through there elected officials) to fire those who unionize.


232 posted on 10/01/2013 9:08:44 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Cruz Control 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies ]

To: Notary Sojac

Both points are fine with me. I don’t see any reason for having a separate body of federal drug laws (or most federal laws, for that matter.)


233 posted on 10/01/2013 9:09:59 AM PDT by jboot (It can happen here because it IS happening here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson