Replies

Does not matter...It does not give you the right to slam into and rear end someone.

Common sense would tell ya, if you have 100 bikes around you in traffic, you should slow and be careful. Suv guy clearly had the attitude...

He ran for his life because even after read ending the MC, he continued to mouth off instead of being civil...In fact if he had been civil, he would have never INTENTIONALLY rear ended the MC.

The AH then ran over another MC as he fled...And he had good reason to flee.. .

Suv boy is extremely dangerous...And lucky to still be walking...

Glad to see you are a level 5 Telapath with postcognition

But what the vid shows is single motercycle in a pack of motorcycles (many of which breaking trafic laws ) with out visible reason decided (his break light is on so it was his decision) to make a VERY rapid deceleration in crowded traffic.

The old.. if you rear end some its automatically your fault does not appy when the one hit IS driving recklessly

Since you seem to like using the common sense argument
COMMON sense tells you DO NOT hit your breaks 15 feet in front of a SUV at speed for no reason.

Since you seem to like using the common sense argument

and..

the MC made an illeagl lane change into the SUV’s lane then charged ahead.. THEN hit breaks.. so Aggressive and illegal operation of a MC.

The issue here is suv guy does not have the right to run into someone because he happens to have an attitude.

. he continued to mouth off instead of being civil...

On many posts you have claimed that it was the driver that had the "The Attitude" yet before the "bump" the RR driver was clearly seen to be driving in a lawful, non aggressive manner.

After escaping by rolling over (abandoned) motorcycles, his actions are not of an individual with "Road Rage" but of an frightened motorist with family to protect.

I offer the video as proof.

When the cyclist pulled inside of the Range Rover's rightful lane, btw ) the "Asian with an Attitude" could have easily sideswiped him out of his lane.

But he didn't.

Nor did the driver speed up or change lanes in pursuit of the "bikers"

No, the evidence clearly shows the "bikers" changing lanes and speeding in attempt to make sport of the occupants of the Range rover. Not at any time did the "bumped" cyclist nor any of the other cyclists found him "threatening" nor did they act in fear of their life

Again it was the scared family man in fear of his life and the life of his family that tried, to the best of his ability to avoid contact with the "bikers"
It was the cyclist moving aggressively(recklessly) in the apparent thought he and his friends could intimidate the family.

But his efforts of "playing chicken" with the SUV backfired as he overestimated the ability of the driver and the SUV to react to his quick maneuvers.