Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Chip

This was early 2011. Nothing had transpired. No one knew anything.

If you are assuming he was very involved in the 2001 incident, I just don’t see it. There’s little evidence of that and if there was more, we’d have seen it by now - given how the OAG has acted thus far.

Again. I do not like Graham Spanier. Never have. But you’re reaching here.


42 posted on 09/28/2013 1:21:08 PM PDT by FlJoePa ("Success without honor is an unseasoned dish; it will satisfy your hunger, but it won't taste good")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: FlJoePa
If you are assuming he was very involved in the 2001 incident, I just don’t see it. There’s little evidence of that and if there was more, we’d have seen it by now - given how the OAG has acted thus far.

According to the Freeh Report and his emails Spanier met with Schulz and Curley in his office and all three decided on a course of action documented in the report with emails and notes.

Is he and are you now saying that that interaction with Curley and Schulz over the Sandusky matter in 2001 did not take place???

43 posted on 09/28/2013 1:37:21 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson