Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cherry
I have heard that other LEOs in jurisdictions that already have cameras as part of their Duty Gear simply turn off the cams when they do not want a recording of whatever is occurring to exist.

Better for us non-LEOs to purchase individual wireless webcams to record situations so even if the camera is forcibly turned off by LEOs or "accidentally" rendered inoperable (broken) at any time a record exists that will provide proof of actual occurrences rather than only the LEO's statement as to how events transpired.

23 posted on 09/26/2013 6:20:23 PM PDT by Utilizer (Bacon A'kbar! - In world today are only peaceful people, and the mooslimbs trying to kill them-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Utilizer
I have heard that other LEOs in jurisdictions that already have cameras as part of their Duty Gear simply turn off the cams when they do not want a recording of whatever is occurring to exist.

IMHO, this would be far worse for any potential misconduct allegations...it shows intent to commit the misconduct on the part of the officer, in addition to evidence tampering. Any laws broken by the officer after that point would be defacto premeditated.

When cameras become standard gear, it should be policy that those devises are recording any interaction with the public or the conduct of any official business, and video files should be included with any police report.
27 posted on 09/26/2013 6:32:49 PM PDT by rottndog ('Live Free Or Die' Ain't just words on a bumber sticker...or a tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson