Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: martinidon

If rats really wanted people to be required to get insurance, why have the fine be a fraction of what the actual premium costs? why not have it be the same amount?


20 posted on 09/26/2013 9:35:13 AM PDT by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad & lived with his parents most his life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: TurboZamboni

Rush was talking about this. The fine is cheap for the first few years, but then it becomes more than getting the insurance. But, with folks paying the fine rather than getting insurance, many insurance companies will go broke and out of business. But that is okay. In a few years the government can step in and offer insurance to replace the failed private companies.

Although I think the plan would be for the government to step in with socialized medicine, because, obviously, insurance doesn’t work. (Remember, it has NEVER been about insurance - it is about Government Healthcare.)


21 posted on 09/26/2013 9:41:49 AM PDT by 21twelve ("We've got the guns, and we got the numbers" adapted and revised from Jim M.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson