To: yldstrk
a heat seeker would have hit an engine not the body of the plane... that's what they do is seek the hottest heat source, and that was not the fuselage
9 posted on
09/25/2013 6:58:24 PM PDT by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: Chode
a heat seeker would have hit an engine not the body of the plane. D@mn you're ruining the whole conspiracy fun....
27 posted on
09/25/2013 7:14:06 PM PDT by
nascarnation
(Democrats control the Presidency, Senate, and Media. It's an uphill climb....)
To: Chode
It wasn’t a heat seeking missile, he said a proximity missile and they’re radar guided.
37 posted on
09/25/2013 7:30:27 PM PDT by
Irenic
(The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheel barrow)
To: Chode
“a heat seeker would have hit an engine not the body of the plane... that’s what they do is seek the hottest heat source, and that was not the fuselage “
A 747’s engines are right there next to the fuselage. Missiles are not terribly accurate at those speeds and it will rarely hit the engine directly. Not to mention, do you know if the missile guidance system is programmed to find center mass between those 4 hot spots and not just strike a single hot spot? (Hint: I know they are.)
63 posted on
09/25/2013 8:48:05 PM PDT by
CodeToad
(Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson