Posted on 09/25/2013 6:49:01 PM PDT by yldstrk
evidence points to an accidental strike by the U.S. Navy. Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/09/aussies-shine-light-on-twa-flight-800/#7rTISaLIIsYHh8gV.99
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
According to Cashill's story there were three missiles. How many witnesses said they saw that many?
I never said three. It was a missile. The story was covered up for political reasons. No terrorist group took credit. Draw your own conclusions.
I'm referring to the Cashill story that started this thread. They're saying 3 missiles. Why didn't anyone see them?
I think it was one missile too, see radar images from Paris Match magazine at the link below.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/CRASH/TWA/RADAR/radar.html
I think it was one missile launched from a sub, see the 3rd screen on that linked web page
Netflix is streaming “TWA: Flight 800” right now. Lots of witness interviews that saw something shoot from the SURFACE up to the sky...what we already know, but pretty good documentary. Also people who were contracted by FBI thugs and told basically to shut up and they didn’t see what they saw.
bfl perusal
Or the terrorists ramp up the scope and scale of their operations until they can neither be ignored nor covered up. Like 9/11.
I was watching a documentary about the TWA Flight 800 cover-up that featured forty or so eyewitnesses and about twenty NTSB investigators who made it clear that the FBI had manipulated evidence, intimidated witnesses, threatened NTSB investigators, and then outright lied to Congress about the facts of the event.
I know this idea is probably a shot-in-the-dark, but what if the shoot down of TWA 800 wasn’t an accident that got covered up? What if it was an assassination?
What if someone like an Edward Snowden had managed to get on that plane and somebody made the decision to shoot it down to prevent that person from escaping the USA? If you look at it this way then it starts to make sense that a US Navy ship could have targeted the plane under the argument that some critical aspect of national security was being protected by the downing of the plane.
And then it makes sense that the FBI would want to hide evidence of any missile because the evidence of the missile would be evidence of a US missile.
Pure speculation, I know, but I thought I’d throw this out there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.