[trubolotta]

It says there are three conservative challengers. That worries me. If it’s three big egos tearing each other apart, Grahm slides in on the spilled blood.

[jazusamo]

I understand in SC in the primary the winner has to have over 50% so there being three challengers it’s not such a problem.

[JRandomFreeper]

No, this has been explained before. SC has a run-off election. The more the merrier at the beginning. As long as Graham doesn't get 50%+

/johnny

[upchuck]

Others have responded. But for the record and for others who may be wondering:

If no candidate receives at least 50% of the vote in the primary, a runoff will be held between the top two vote-getters.

Voters who voted in a party's primary, can vote only in the runoff of the same party. Voters who did not vote in the primary, may vote in either party's runoff.

The primary is for Democratic and Republican candidates only. Candidates running unopposed for their Party's nomination will not appear on primary ballots.

Voters may not vote in a political party's runoff if they voted in another political party's primary. However, voters who did not vote in either politicial party's primary may vote in either politicial party's runoff.

A defeated primary candidate may not actively offer or campaign as a write-in candidate for the ensuing election. The use of posters or stickers on the ballot is not permitted. The voting machine provides for a voter to write-in a candidate. Write-in votes are not allowed in primary elections or the election of President or Vice-president.

While the state permits fusion (a candidate may be nominated by multiple parties), if a candidate runs for and looses a primary (of any party), the candidate cannot appear on the November ballot.

Source.

[I_be_tc]

I thought I read that they all agreed to drop out, if not in lead, and let the highest voted guy take out Graham. I could be wrong, I am old, but that was my understanding.