[tacticalogic]

That's one of the things that makes science hard - the conclusion has to explain the evidence, and is always subject to revision in light of new evidence.

Dogma is easier. You start with the conclusion and it never changes regardless what the evidence says.

[Boogieman]

“Dogma is easier. You start with the conclusion and it never changes regardless what the evidence says.”

Remind me again, where is all the evidence that supports the conclusion Darwin started with (that all life has a common ancestor)?

Oh, and remember you can’t simply list similarities, since those are explicable by other mechanisms besides common ancestry.

[BrandtMichaels]

“Dogma is easier. You start with the conclusion and it never changes regardless what the evidence says.” ==> Sure sounds just like evolution to me!!! :’)