Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: norwaypinesavage
"It also seems to me that when a police officer gets paid for off duty security, and cannot even be identified as a policeman, he doesn't have the protections afforded to on-duty police officers."

From the video I saw the so-called police officer (Who was wearing a t-shirt that said security) assaulted the citizen at least once.

In my neck of the woods if this was tried in a town hall meeting and some jerk with a pretty t-shirt manhandled a citizen asking questions that jerk wouldn't make it to his car unscathed and many of those meting out a little small town justice on the hired thug would be the local off duty police.

Speaking your mind in a public forum is taken very seriously around here. Of course we still say the Lord's prayer at school functions so we're some of those bitter-clinger rebels you here the Liberals talk about.

11 posted on 09/24/2013 5:04:15 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawgg
That is why they selected a security officer with the "special, privileged, you-can't-question-me skin" tone.

Absolutely nothing will come of this.

20 posted on 09/24/2013 5:23:15 AM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (Tried to tell 'em Affirmative Action was a bad idea...Now look what happened!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson