[ozdragon]

Unfortunately, most New Yorkers are too young to remember how dangerous the City was under Dinkins. We have been spoiled by 20 years of good, effectives mayors (Guiliani and Bloomberg).
DeBlasio is likely to be a worse mayor than Dinkins.

[Eric in the Ozarks]

NYers will get the politics they voted for, good and hard.

[kabumpo]

Bloomberg is not a good mayor. I had thought that nothing could be worse than the incompetent, corrupt Dinkins - because I couldn’t imagine something as terrible as Bloomberg. He is a lunatic petty tyrant, obsessed with bottles of soda instead of dealing with the city’s real problems.

[EinNYC]

Bloomberg could NEVER be considered a "good effective mayor". More like the favorite minion of Satan. He wasted hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars in schemes like CityTime, 911 "revamping", and many no-bid contracts. He decimated the city's schools and has put the veteran teachers through undeserved living hell. He has harassed the entire populace by imposing "His Will" on them, such as banning large sodas. He has interfered with the will of the people by investing large sums of his own limitless monies on anti-gun and other causes. He has added countless minutes to commuters commuting time with his asinine BIKE LANES that perhaps 1 person/week use, sacrificing traffic lanes for that nonsense.

I could add much more, but why waste time and bandwidth on this sorry POS?

[EinNYC]

DeBlasio would be to NYC what Odungo is to the entire U.S. We would be a microcosm. There just isn’t any farther to the left that you could go, he’s there. I just read today that DeBlasio has legally changed his name a couple of times. I wonder what kind of unstable churning mind does that?