Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PieterCasparzen

CIA was documented as doing some thoroughly naughty things in the sixties and thereabouts, IIRC. It also blew up into a huge scandal and some very public wrist slapping. Bottom line: organizations and people aren’t static. If you want to look like you got your accusational ducks in a row, try to at least have them coexist in time.


23 posted on 09/20/2013 8:26:09 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Lion of Judah will roar again if you give him a big hug and a cheer and mean it. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck
CIA was documented as doing some thoroughly naughty things in the sixties and thereabouts, IIRC. It also blew up into a huge scandal and some very public wrist slapping.

The fed LSD to people, including CIA employees, without their knowledge and one of the "test subjects" proceeded to jump out a window to his death.

Bottom line: organizations and people aren’t static. If you want to look like you got your accusational ducks in a row, try to at least have them coexist in time.

I'd have to spend my life investigating and writing volumes, which I'm not about to do just to prove a point, especially since most people would dismiss it no matter how good the evidence was. There already is a lot of research out there on the subject for those who are interested enough to read.

I'm simply trying to "raise awareness" as they say.

The number one thing I see as rotten and implying a conspiratorial connection is the very founding of the OSS and CIA by Wall Street / eastern establishment people, and the continued domination of the agency by the same establishment types.

The ruler of a nation must be absolutely sure that his espionage agents and diplomatic advisors to himself are truly loyal to him and his nation.

If the business leaders (mega-business, not mom-and-pop) of his nation "volunteer" to build and espionage agency for him, and all their people staff up the ruler's diplomatic service, and become his direct foreign policy advisors - and all those business leaders have direct business ties to their wealthy and influential counterparts in other nations, and those dealings are opaque to the ruler and his government, the first obvious question is - are they loyal to their nation or to their moneymaking ? Because they certainly could use their influence on foreign policy to enrich themselves in the process of instigating all sorts of coordinated wars and threats of war.

Once again, I point folks to the work of the eminent historian Antony Sutton, regarding the relationship between American and German business and banking during the years between the wars. If you keep researching international banking, you find that it is rotten to the core; there is no way to rationalize some of the facts.
34 posted on 09/21/2013 9:59:27 AM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson