Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The real Navy Yard scandal
The Washington ComPost ^ | September 19 2013 | By Charles Krauthammer MD

Posted on 09/20/2013 6:51:37 AM PDT by US Navy Vet

In the liberal remake of “Casablanca,” the police captain comes upon the scene of the shooting and orders his men to “round up the usual weapons.”

It’s always the weapon and never the shooter. Twelve people are murdered in a rampage at the Washington Navy Yard, and before sundown Sen. Dianne Feinstein has called for yet another debate on gun violence. Major opprobrium is heaped on the AR-15, the semiautomatic used in the Newtown massacre.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: banglist; charleskrauthammer; dc; guncontrol; krauthammer; navyyard; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
GREAT Read by DR Krauthammer!
1 posted on 09/20/2013 6:51:37 AM PDT by US Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet
Dr. Krauthammer and Ann Coulter are the only ones (twos) that I have seen even broach this subject.
As I have been saying since I first heard of Alexis’ melt down in Newport, Rhode island.
Political Correctness, Affirmative Action and mental illness are to blame for damn near every mass shooting in this country since 1970. At least one or more of the three are responsible damn near every time.
2 posted on 09/20/2013 7:00:57 AM PDT by Tupelo (There are no Republicans or Democrats in Washington. Just Millionaires protecting their turf.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

I have sat and watched a loved one go from psychotic back to himself within 30 minutes after administration of an anti-psychotic medication. It’s not unlike taking care of someone with diabetes or asthma. I’ve also seen people on the street in large cities who need to be arrested for assault and taken to the emergency room for the “hold” that Dr. K is talking about. It’s for their own good and once there much can be done. We are past the years when these folks were taken to drab hospitals and locked up in their own filth and given electroshock therapy. A generation or two ago, nothing could be done besides heavily medicating them. Many became chronic alcoholics because alcohol quieted some of the voices and then the world rejected the dirty, drunk, incoherent child of God. I understand the resistance to locking them up even for a couple of days but the alternative is what has been happening time after time. The ones who kill are a minority but there are a lot of others out there suffering who need intervention. I thank God every day that my loved one got that intervention.


3 posted on 09/20/2013 7:02:48 AM PDT by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet
OK, the good Doctor got me on this one:

op·pro·bri·um -- very strong disapproval or criticism of a person or thing especially by a large number of people

4 posted on 09/20/2013 7:04:09 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (0bama lied, Stevens died, now 0bama covers up the lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Bump


5 posted on 09/20/2013 7:05:00 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( ==> sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mercat
It’s not unlike taking care of someone with diabetes or asthma.

Bingo! I have a relative who was feeling self conscious about having to take anti depressants. that's exactly what I told her. I think it helped.

6 posted on 09/20/2013 7:12:19 AM PDT by knittnmom (Save the earth! It's the only planet with chocolate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mercat

The problem becomes a statistical analysis.

In an average day....you’ve got forty thousand people across the US who are threatening people. Twenty will be arrested and toted off to some jail. The rest? We just try to overlook and pretend they aren’t really going to kill us. Out of the forty thousand incidents...probably a dozen will actually kill someone....a relative...a friend...or just some stranger on the street.

We’ve got a problem that simply won’t go away, and it needs action. All this talk over taking weapons away is a total waste....I wish they’d use that time and talk to discuss actions on those are the actual threat.


7 posted on 09/20/2013 7:12:22 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: knittnmom

I remember a member of our choir one Christmas eve showed up acting like someone who had been drinking heavily. A friend led him away and came back and reported that he was having a diabetes episode. It’s quite scary how minor fluctuations in chemicals in our brains have such a strong effect.


8 posted on 09/20/2013 7:16:32 AM PDT by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet
I am not sure even if the perp was seen to by a psychiatric practitioner.

Was or was not Alexis on medication? And why was he not being referred to see a specialist, after the RI incident?

9 posted on 09/20/2013 7:21:30 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

I would like to know what technologies the ‘Agency’ has to create a “hearing voices” symdrome. This may be where the real scandel lies.

https://sites.google.com/site/mcrais/voices


10 posted on 09/20/2013 7:21:52 AM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

The real scandal is apparently they were paying $12.15 an hour for a low-level IT contractor whom HP was probably billing the government at least seventy bucks an hour for.

With the cost of living in D.C. you can barely hire someone with three functioning brain cells at that wage. Of course the pool is going to be made up of mental defectives. Somebody had to rubber stamp his clearance. It was the only way such a job could ever be filled.


11 posted on 09/20/2013 7:23:27 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/contractor-which-vetted-snowden-says-it-did-background-check-for-navy-yard-shooter/2013/09/19/7e778cae-2173-11e3-a358-1144dee636dd_story.html


12 posted on 09/20/2013 7:25:27 AM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: iontheball

High EMF will do it.


13 posted on 09/20/2013 7:32:30 AM PDT by Anton.Rutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo; Mercat
I agree with your emotions.

But I am very concerned about the consequences of ComDems “deeming” everyone who has an emotional episode as suddenly stripped of all rights. If they are a threat, there is no issue. If some nurse scribbles on an admission form a coded block and suddenly they are put in a database to remove all 2nd amendment rights, this would be the Left’s wet dream. They would declare us all mentally deficient and send us to the looney bin.

Caution is in order. The track record of psychiatrists is not good in general. Many people with emotional issues are not a threat to anyone.

With the approach of ObamaCare Insanity, this will be a much bigger issue. As the non-medical bureaucraps start making medical decisions for us, without our concurrence and without recourse you will see what I am speaking of.

14 posted on 09/20/2013 7:40:37 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Good point.


15 posted on 09/20/2013 7:44:42 AM PDT by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil
But I am very concerned about the consequences of ComDems “deeming” everyone who has an emotional episode as suddenly stripped of all rights.

A rational concern. Nor do we want government defining what constitutes mental health without very careful deliberation. If it took a jury trial, would that be a sufficient cause for caution on the part of the "mental health" bureaucrats?

16 posted on 09/20/2013 8:06:12 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (Islam offers choices: convert, submit, or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

I had thought that the AR-15(Newtown)was found in the trunk of the car that Adam Lanza drove?NBC”Broke”that story and then(QUICKLY)”HUSHED IT UP”???????????????????


17 posted on 09/20/2013 8:30:05 AM PDT by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo

You are EXACTLY CORRECT!Word of Alexis’s”Breakdown”was passed through”Channels” but NEVER got there!!!!!!!!!!!!!


18 posted on 09/20/2013 8:31:42 AM PDT by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mercat
It’s not unlike taking care of someone with diabetes or asthma.

The analogy is imperfect.

It would be like treating an asthma or diabetes attack, then any guns you or your spouse own would be confiscated and you would be put on a list preventing you from ever having one again in your life, with no way to get your name off the list.

19 posted on 09/20/2013 8:44:39 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (It's hard to accept the truth when the lies were exactly what you wanted to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet; All
I wonder if Dr. Krauthammer has changed his opionion about the necessity of disarming the American citizenry. From “Disarm the Citizenry. But not yet.”, Washington Post, April 5,1996:

“Ultimately, a civilized society must disarm its citizenry if it is to have a modicum of domestic tranquillity of the kind enjoyed in sister democracies like Canada and Britain. Given the frontier history and individualist ideology of the United States, however, this will not come easily. It certainly cannot be done radically. It will probably take one, maybe two generations. It might be 50 years before the United States gets to where Britain is today.

Passing a law like the assault weapons ban is a symbolic — purely symbolic — move in that direction. Its only real justification is not to reduce crime but to desensitize the public to the regulation of weapons in preparation for their ultimate confiscation. Its purpose is to spark debate, highlight the issue, make the case that the arms race between criminals and citizens is as dangerous as it is pointless.”

20 posted on 09/20/2013 8:48:59 AM PDT by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson