Guess that is, indeed, the best you can do.
My 17 paragraphs are a demonstration that your supposedly simple question is not so simple as you would like to represent it to be. So, you are left with nothing but to try to change the subject from the Kimball article to my alleged inability to answer a simple question in less than 17 paragraphs. Your attempt to change the subject is an admission of intellectual poverty.
But, if thats the best you can do . . .
I'm not sure about the rest you've listed, but I'm pretty sure Dawkins is an atheist.