Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: shego

Socially moderate Republicans are silent when business owners are punished for practicing their faith. Guess being Libertarian only matters when it means supporting gay rights.


49 posted on 09/19/2013 11:25:58 AM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RginTN

When your brain shuts down you make bad guesses.


50 posted on 09/19/2013 11:28:05 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: RginTN

I am one of those “Libertarian Republicans” that many of you think is all evil and want to rid the GOP of “real” conservatives. That is bunk, and I will do my best to explain why.

First, I am a Navy vet so the last thing I am is soft on defense. Ron Paul and other libertarians are crazier than a rat in a tin $hit house when it comes to defense. I realize that we must protect our interests globally, this is not 1820.

What is a “real” conservative? The last time I checked a “real” conservative would have a huge problem with the government running people’s lives. This is why gay marriage and abortion are such issues. I am not in favor of either, but I damn sure am not in favor of the Feds dictating the actions of people either. Leave those issues to the states and locals.

On this site many complain about how the liberals claim that paying taxes to support the “needy” is a form of charity and as Christians we should not be so loathe to do so. Conservatives correctly argue that it is not charity if one is forced to give by the barrel of a gun. The same applies to legislating morality. Are we being moral by not performing or favoring gay marriage or abortion (I oppose abortion because the baby has rights too) because the federal government does not allow it? The same principle applies, so no we are not being moral. The GOP is seen as being hypocritical by many in the electorate because of this. We all know those things are wrong, but what matters is what is in a person’s heart, and that cannot be legislated on any level, so why compromise our limited government principles trying?

So, when it proposed that the GOP let social issues go on a national level, think again as to why this may be a palatable idea. As of right now, cultural issues are not winning over voters. There are many reasons for this. But, if we want to fix the GOP brand I am of the belief that what we need to do is declare that the GOP still opposes these issues, but is not interested in having the federal government do so. That they should be left to the states. The GOP should truly push a very limited government at the federal level and encourage voters to handle social issues at local levels.

The federal government needs to concentrate on carrying out its mandated duties. One of which is border security (which is why I oppose illegal immigration). Not all libertarians think the same way, as can be said about the members of any political party. Because some come out in favor of gay marriage does not mean we all are. If that is the case then the same could be said about Republicans.


78 posted on 09/19/2013 12:34:41 PM PDT by BizBroker (There is no "radical Islam", there is only Islam itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson