Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ANALYSIS: The long road ahead in ending Fukushima water problem
The Asahi Shimbun ^ | September 18, 2013 | Shunsuke Kimura, Ryuta Koike and Senior Staff Writer Hisashi Hattori

Posted on 09/19/2013 4:00:00 AM PDT by SteveH

Even geography is working against Tokyo Electric Power Co. and the government in their struggle to deal with the persistent problem of radiation-contaminated water at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant.

The site receives so much groundwater that special equipment--rendered useless by the 2011 earthquake and tsunami--was set up to prevent the plant’s buildings from floating on the continuous flow.

The most pressing problem is stopping the groundwater from entering the plant’s reactor buildings, becoming contaminated and spilling into the sea. But it is far from the only obstacle in the roadmap to decommission the reactors at the stricken plant.

TEPCO still does not know all the details of how and where groundwater is entering the buildings. Also in the dark about the full extent of the problem, the central government has stepped in and is resorting to unprecedented measures with potential pitfalls.

An estimated 800 to 1,000 tons of groundwater flows daily in the direction of the Fukushima plant buildings, a volume much larger than those at other nuclear plants.

(Excerpt) Read more at ajw.asahi.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Japan
KEYWORDS: fukushima; tepco

1 posted on 09/19/2013 4:00:00 AM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SteveH
No problem. Dr. Joseph Oehmen said everything would be just fine.

/s

2 posted on 09/19/2013 4:07:34 AM PDT by edpc (Wilby 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc

There is a concentrated effort to minimize public discussion and disclosure of Fukushima’s global RADIATION impact. Doubters and nay-sayers abound on FR.


3 posted on 09/19/2013 5:09:02 AM PDT by Tugo (POTUS is a Sunni)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tugo

Discuss all you want, just don’t use a map of wave heights as if it were a radiation chart.


4 posted on 09/19/2013 5:24:39 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mvpel

What is the best current Pacific Ocean radiologic impact analysis?


5 posted on 09/19/2013 6:28:35 AM PDT by Tugo (POTUS is a Sunni)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson