Posted on 09/17/2013 4:55:12 PM PDT by Morgana
Vice President Joe Biden’s son is one of the luminaries who have lent their name to a pro-abortion event NARAL is sponsoring designed to get more men to promote abortion.
NARAL is hosting the first annual [sic] “Men for Choice” gathering at a D.C. restaurant. Hunter Biden, the vice president’s second son and a partner at the Rosemont Seneca Partners law firm, lent his name to the event, according to NARAL’s promotional flier.
The younger Biden, like his father, is promoting abortion and the radical pro-abortion group despite his Catholic faith. Hunter Biden received a bachelor’s degree from Georgetown University and was a member of the Jesuit Volunteer Corps Northwest but appears to have no regard for the Catholic Church’s pro-life teachings.
Nathan Daschle, son of former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, Joe Lockhart, former press secretary to President Bill Clinton, and Bill Burton, former campaign press secretary for President Barack Obama, are also lending their names to the pro-abortion event.
Earlier this year, Vice President Joe Biden put his foot in his mouth again.
Never mind that Vice President Joe Biden has been rebuked by his own bishop over his pro-abortion views, President Barack Obama chose him to lead the delegation. That decision prompted an outcry from Catholics and pro-life non-Catholics alike because of Biden’s longstanding pro-abortion record. Some pro-life advocates have called for Biden to be prohibited from receiving communion at any ceremony for Pope Francis.
Biden said he plans to attend the celebratory Mass. He confirmed he will be attending a reception tonight with the presidential delegation to the inaugural mass with American officials based in Rome. Biden said he had to attend “or I’ll lose my soul.”
Of course Democrats want child molestors to be able to hide the evidence of their sexual crimes the say way the media hides the evidence of their other crimes.
If you want to see the sexual revolution come to a screeching halt, wait until science comes up with an easy birth control pill for men.
When men get a simple, dependable solution to control their fertility that doesn’t interfere with their life or sex at all, then it won’t take long for females to figure out that they have to go back to the old ways to make the male sex drive work for them.
Right now, women have control at all levels, when a male can do what he wants with zero chance of pregnancy resulting, then something will change to end that little dream of having easy girls, with no catches or gotchas.
Well, they kind of do. There are vasectomies and there are (in places like China that are rabid about this sort of thing). I would not apply any human logic to the “sexual revolution” however.
(China has drugs for that)
Men for Murder.
Men for all the free milk you can get.
Men for no responsibility.
Men for Satan.
Men For Murder
Careful, you’re making my point for me.
It’s a 17 year old boys’ world. Tight about the time they have to learn how to say no to sex, our culture makes way for them to have to learn how to do so, as in all other cultures before the 1970s.
And now, as Mark Levin reads aloud, about the Constitutional Convention and the names involved, of delegates and statesmen, and juxtaposed is the son of the VP championing killing babies for the sake of sex with no consequences.
Anyone who finds this complicated is under the illusion that men can have sex as recreation under approval of the culture and at the same time provide a civilized culture.
No they don’t have an easy birth control pill for men.
Vasectomies and prophylactics have been around from decades to centuries, and we don’t like either one.
If you want a reversal of the sexual revolution, then wait until men get an easy, trouble free, guy friendly way to temporarily block their fertility, then the game will change.
Right now chicks can dress to the nines and go to drinking establishments to present themselves to young 20 something professionals, and if they can pregnant, then they are in total control, a well paid early retirement, or an abortion, government enforcement and collections, welfare, or whatever they want, even coercion into marriage in a few rare cases I suppose.
That game won’t be there if a magic pill gets invented, especially one that can be taken once a month or something.
With a male pill, then it will be 100% purely about cheap sex with a stranger, a stranger who loves that game and doesn’t care about her and who she will have no influence over, I don’t think females will let that go on for long.
No, I’m not making your point for you at all, I am pointing out what an idiot you are to blame men for mothers deciding to have sex and then deciding to abort or not.
I think that you may be the same man hating feminist that I ran into a couple of months ago, who thinks that women are victims, and men force abortions on them.
A display of your ignorance about men is to keep insisting that the sex drive of men is only a factor when they are 17.
Anyone who expects the men to be the withholders of sex in the human interaction of dating and in the sexual interaction of courting and social meetings, is not playing with a full deck.
I guess I hit a nerve
No, but that statement is like all of your posts, goofy, and revealing an underlying agenda and some kind of creepy man hating feminist insanity.
Whatever it is, it’s not like the baby hating insanity were living in and people like your buddy, Biden Jr. Are championing
Considering how reliable the female pill is do you really really want to rely on a male one? Side affects? Long term affects? Forgetting to take it affects? HiTech RedNeck is correct about the Vasectomies. At least you know the baby is not yours in that area. Have no idea why men act like babies (no pun intended) about it.
I still think loose women will take joy in the emotional side of seduction. It ought to be easy to find it out for sure, though. Just ask a loose woman if she cares whether or not the guy having sex with her had a vasectomy. If she does not care... then the fertility isn’t the issue with that madam.
“Vasectomy essentially ensures that in most cases the patient will be sterile after confirmation of success following surgery. The procedure is regarded by the medical profession as permanent because vasectomy reversal is costly and often does not restore the sperm count and/or motility to pre-vasectomy levels.”
If vasectomy surgery was the answer then most of us would have had one, vasectomies don’t much appeal to men, especially 17 and 19 and 20 year old men, or hardly any man who isn’t married or old, getting fixed is not exactly top of the list for college kids.
An easy dependable form will be invented for men someday, and when it is, then men will temporarily control the world of sex, 100%, no lawyers, no government, no coerced marriages, no aborted children, all control will be in the hands of the man and their barely controllable sex drives.
My prediction is that women won’t accept that power imbalance for long, for then, they would truly be nothing but play things with no gains in return.
It will exist, it always has, but it won't be very common, I'm not even sure how it would affect women when at some point in the future after decades of this miracle male birth control, they become 100% convinced that the men are not carrying potential for pregnancy.
Sometimes we forget that for the biological impulses that we see and generally talk about, that there are still deeper and unknown levels to the biological impulses and drives.
I’ve heard, not recommending it, but heard, that a hot bath will temporarily kill sperm. There’s a reason that testicles dangle, getting looser in hotter climes and pulling up close in colder ones; adjustment of the temperature is needed to ensure that the family jewels keep on optimally doing what the good Lord set them in place to do. However I really believe it an abomination to purposely misuse one’s sexual faculties. When the bible says to keep the marriage bed undefiled, this isn’t just a nice sentiment. From this point of view, anything that is meant to pervert the God given purpose of the sex act between two spouses is a bad thing. Not the unforgivable sin, it won’t scuttle a salvation you have accepted, but you don’t keep doing it unrepentantly if you want to be blessed and want to avoid divine chastisement.
It is simple to tell, like I said. You’re making it difficult. Ask the loose woman if she cares if the fellow is infertile (by vasectomy or otherwise). If she does not care then it’s an emotion game. I think it’s more she doesn’t bother with contraception on HER end because she wants to feel as natural as possible. Yep, the pills don’t just serve as a biological block, they take some of the thrill of sex out of it for the woman.
I was discussing human sexuality in America and the culture at large, hot baths don’t really figure in to that, and I’m not personally seeking to reduce my sperm count, nor looking for birth control methods.
Yeah there’s a deeper level and it is spiritual. Just by being loose, the woman already says she disdains the life transmitting nature of sex. HOW she disdains it, whether through counting on having an abortion or otherwise, is not relevant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.