Posted on 09/17/2013 5:52:19 AM PDT by bryan999
Nothing to see here.....intimidate and move the Elect Hitlery campaign forward.....
Suspicion: Disclosure that the US was smuggling chemical weapons from Libya to the Syrian rebels would not be convenient at this time.
Hoping he sings like a songbird and screams his head off.
Bourne against Barry.
Infuriating. I fear we’ll never know the absolute truth.
“We’re not keeping congress from speaking to them, honest!”
He has most likely signed other agreements to keep information confidential. If he comes forward they can and will arrest him and hold him under the Homeland Security act. (Can’t recall the exact name of it.) But he can be held indefinitely without access to a lawyer.
...immediately I thought with or without pay...since the customary "with pay" IS NOT in the story...anyone read anywhere?
They are not. Congress can talk to them all they want.
ya, they have to do it through the MSM and hope someone replies.
But congress can ask all the questions they want.
We KNOW things happened in Benghazi that will hurt Obama and Hillary if they became public.
And, we KNOW Big Media won’t touch this story, just for that very reason, unless it’s right in their face. We NEED someone to publicly testify to make it unavoidable!
All it takes to open the Benghazi dam is one guy who refuses to be intimidated .... could this be the case here?
America could use a hero right about now, as an antidote to to what’s in the White House.
I hope that employee has bodyguards to prevent the “accident” that is likely to befall him...
How long until the gayMuzzie enabled airliner shoot-down...?
R there any State Dept. employees that want to talk?
suspended with or without pay?
There must be somebody on our side who's willing to take this case on and get to the bottom of this stink hole. Who will step up to the plate?
Exactly.
First, and foremost...they’d have to sit there and write down what exactly happened...line by line, and then have some officer bless it as classified at a certain level.
Maybe they can find such a guy who’d sign off on it being classified....but then the question is...you’ve got a written record of what went on....line by line. That gets to being messy (you ask the Nazis about that in WW II). My humble guess is that no one has written a real report over this...simply a summary, which had a classification stamp on it.
If this guy stands up and says something....over a non-existent record or non-existent document...then it’s not a violation. They may pretend it is...but it doesn’t stand up in a military or civilian court. Regulations are based on factual records or data...without that....there is no violation.
I should add this...if this had been an actual US military or CIA operation...with thousands of lines of text over the conduct, timing, or actions....then he’d be in trouble over comments about that. Strangely enough...there was no US operation underway (unless they admit that the ambassador was on a secret mission).
It’d seem to me....they just dig more into a empty legal pit if this guy goes public and says things which aren’t recorded anywhere.
“Isn’t there a federal law (or two or three) against this?”
The NWO agenda supercedes any Federal or State law. Further, the Constitution does not apply when it could hurt the obamas or the Clintons.
Didn’t you get the memo?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.