Posted on 09/12/2013 7:54:33 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross
National Journal's Ron Fournier, a veteran DC journo who calls 'em like he sees 'em, hasn't been terribly impressed with President Obama's careening and incomprehensible handling of the crisis in Syria. In an unsparing review, Fournier concludes that Obama has demonstrated himself to be naive and isolated. Behold what 'smart power' hath wrought:
I've used the word "incoherent" quite often in describing the administration's ever-shifting Syria posture. Fox News produced a montage that begins to capture the incoherence, albeit without some of the more memorable fumbles and contradictions (video at link):
Meanwhile, we're reportedly distributing "lethal aid" to certain Syrian rebel groups. Have they been properly vetted? Do we know if they run the risk of being disarmed and overtaken by Al Qaeda? Would these be the same "moderate" rebels who feel abandoned by the US, whose leadership is fracturing, and who pledge to join forces with the radicals to take out Assad? For those delusional few who are at least pretending to believe that Obama outfoxed Putin over Syria, it looks as though US-Russo relations have declined to a post-Soviet nadir. So much for the "reset." This is open, emboldened hostility:
Beyond that, as others have pointed out over the last 24 hours, experts have assessed that the process of "disarming" Syria of its WMDs in the middle of a civil war is essentially impossible. And that's assuming that Assad would genuinely surrender all of the illegal weapons...that he wouldn't even acknowledge possessing until yesterday. Keep in mind that his regime has been preparing for a possible US strike for days. Might those preparations have entailed moving and hiding certain strategic weapons stockpiles? As Ramesh Ponnuru has noted, Assad likely believes that his chemical weapons cache is a backstop against being overthrown and killed. Are we to believe that he'd willingly surrender his heinous trump card, especially under Russian supervision? Just three days ago, Obama's UN ambassador was slamming Moscow. Now the Kremlin is the fulcrum on which a peaceful resolution hinges? Even as they're threatening us, blowing kisses at Iran, and obstructing any meaningful action at the Security Council? The entire proposition is risible, back to front. Even many liberal writers can't avoid excoriating the president's Syria performance, averring that Obama "struck out" by getting "snookered," rendering his administration "dazed and confused." One cutting line: "To say that the Obama administration is freelancing when it comes to foreign policy is an insult to freelancers." Peggy Noonan says Obama should have just canceled last night's speech. He didn't, the public mostly shrugged, and here we are. I'll leave you with former New York Times editor Bill Keller listing the ways in which Putin just ate Obama's lunch.
Affirmative Action hire. No surprises here.
It doesn't really matter what they are saying, it's all nonsense anyway.
The difference between the clowns and politicians is that the clowns are wise enough to know that their feckless talk doesn't mean anything.
Barry is Putin’s pitiful poodle. Good totalitarian/toy totalitarian ALERT!
FUPOSOTUS
This whole episode was designed and executed to hold the nation up to world ridicule. Zero just acted out his role (like any hired actor). He read his lines and did as he was told by his handlers - for which he will be well paid.
Never forget - their ultimate goal is the destruction and enslavement of the United States.
Well-stated. Thanks.
Best Cliff Notes summary of the speech I’ve read - and from the Dummie Underground no less:
“Gas sucks, dead children are terrible, so I want to attack, but were working on a diplomatic solution, yet if youre on the right and love the military, or if youre on the left and love human rights, you totally have to look at the dead kids on YouTube and get behind me on attacking Syria even though Ive asked Congress to suspend the vote and were pursuing diplomacy so there wont be an attack, or something.”
And yours is a fine Cliff Notes distillation of the above.
Amateur hour, indeed!
CONFESSION TO MY FREEPER PALS: I keep having wonderful daydreams, trying to guess who Obama lacerated for the debacle.
Was it Valerie? Advisor Susan "no-brain" Rice? Jay Carney? Joe Biden? John Kerry? Nancy Pelosi---who talked up Obama's "strength"? David Axelrod (now at CBS-egging on Ohaha in a tweet to media).
Mmmmmmmm....I'm guessing it was Michele.
"Forget the new diamonds and the Vineyard house, Michele.
Our war profits went kaput when that dam Putin weighed in."
Mental illness I could live with, EVIL is a whole another ball of wax.
Look for these episodes to continue for 3.5 more years.
Thanks, Servant of the Cross. (great minds...)
Thats pretty good, I may spread that around.
Well if mac daddy is a poodle then what are the willing sock puppets that mac daddy controls in his administration?
Poodle shi*?
Parasites in the Poodle shi*
Look to see the Rebels attack Israel with gas next—and try to blame it on the Syrian Dictator and being Israel into the fight. (or Syria might to it to discredit the rebels more). A few SCUDS full of Sarin or Mustard Gas in a northern Israeli town might change things—if they got past Iron Dome. Look to see more gas used in any case.
You realize what you just spelled out there is predicted in the Bible..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.