Skip to comments.
Some LGBT activists outraged by new dress code for Dallas Pride
Dallas Voice ^
| Sept 11, 2013
| John Wright
Posted on 09/11/2013 7:53:05 PM PDT by kevcol
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: kevcol
Good grief. I’ve been living in DFW for eight years, and never even knew about this. I guess I shouldn’t be surprised. I suppose every large city has a ‘gay day’ nowadays.
When I was a young musician in L.A., my buddies and I would go to the gay festival in Silverlake to hear the bands. After the big parade was over, it was 90% straight folks there, so we felt comfortable.
I wouldn’t get within a mile of a gay festival today.
21
posted on
09/11/2013 8:52:45 PM PDT
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: kevcol
But every gay person just wants to live a normal life with their adopted children... /S
To: kevcol
what about lesbian nipple erections, i sure hope’to hell those are felonies too. maybe they can be charged with two felonies.
23
posted on
09/11/2013 9:18:24 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: fieldmarshaldj
inherent in their perverted nature.
24
posted on
09/11/2013 9:19:37 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: liege
seriously you don’t think it will be erect?
25
posted on
09/11/2013 9:20:09 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Morgana
namely that it requires they be dressed.
26
posted on
09/11/2013 9:20:33 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: dragnet2
she’s the typical obese lesbian.
27
posted on
09/11/2013 9:21:32 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Secret Agent Man
I was only commenting on the absurdity of the language regarding whether something would be illegal or not based on whether someone had an erection or not.
Is not a naked man in public cause enough for arrest?
28
posted on
09/11/2013 9:29:00 PM PDT
by
bubbacluck
(America 180)
To: liege
not at a privileged protected class gay pride parade. their normal is not our normal. regular people would be arrested .
29
posted on
09/11/2013 9:33:20 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: kevcol
I thought they wanted to be treated like everyone else...
To: kevcol
some LGBT activists expressed outrage this week after organizers reminded participants about the need for the event to be family-friendly and said nudity and lewd behavior will no longer be tolerated.
.-———————————————————————————
They want to be as gross as possible in public. Heterosexuals being nude and lewd in public would be slapped down, but some in the LGBT want superior rights.
To: kevcol
These parades are Satanic covens, nothing more.
I wonder if cops are required to work this event.
32
posted on
09/11/2013 9:54:56 PM PDT
by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: kevcol
President Putin would have the faggots thrown in a gulag.
To: GeronL
You saw a lot of naked erections at your school?
Public schools must be worse than I thought.
34
posted on
09/11/2013 10:17:54 PM PDT
by
Trailerpark Badass
(There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach, said one woman.)
To: dragnet2
...Ms. hogger on the far left at #13...I see only 3 possibilities:
a) fag hag.
b) proud bovine clamlicker.
c) Code pink operative... which would obviously wheel "a" or "b" into the answer.
35
posted on
09/11/2013 11:25:34 PM PDT
by
Rodamala
To: fwdude
I wonder if cops are required to work this event.
I would imagine so since these folks pay their salaries.
36
posted on
09/12/2013 3:44:37 AM PDT
by
napscoordinator
( Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the Country!)
To: Secret Agent Man
Perversion is an outdated, 20th century concept. Now we say, “different”, children...
37
posted on
09/12/2013 3:48:59 AM PDT
by
epluribus_2
(he had the best mom - ever.)
To: Rodamala
QUOTE: a) fag hag.
That is SOOooo 20th century.
Try “fairy princess.”
*snort*
38
posted on
09/12/2013 4:15:02 AM PDT
by
Peet
(Oderint dum metuant)
To: kevcol
But Liebbe added: If theres an erection,
and a child is present that could see it, it is a felony, and we dont want to see that happen.
There, that's better.
39
posted on
09/12/2013 4:17:23 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
To: kevcol
"Keep your nose out of what I do in the bedroom, but let me shove it in your face if I want to."
"No."
"Waaah!"
40
posted on
09/12/2013 4:19:38 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson