Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 1raider1
During a legal challenge launched by Local 150, Judge John Sedia took issue with the part of the law requiring unions to represent workers while making illegal for them to require membership dues.

So the law says that you are not required to be a part of the Union but the Union is required to represent you? That doesn't sound fair. If you don't want to be part of the Union then you shouldn't have to join. But if the Union negotiates a pay raise for their members then you shouldn't be covered by it.

42 posted on 09/10/2013 8:45:49 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

The statute doesn’t require that the union represent anyone who is not a member. The statute merely provides that union membership shall be made a condition of employment.


48 posted on 09/10/2013 10:22:12 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson