Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Black Agnes
So your argument is that it’s ‘socially’ possible to influence sperm counts and male secondary sexual characteristics?

No, I didn't say that. I was referring to feminizing in a behavioral sense.

28 posted on 09/09/2013 8:21:58 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: ChildOfThe60s

If they’re having fewer swimmers and overall ‘issues’ wrt their male parts (see the plosone study), it would make sense that they would be increasingly behaviorally feminized.

There are times in a males development when testosterone surges. And the brain is subsequently masculinized. Prenatally, from 2-4m, right around the time they start school, and of course puberty. Inadequate boy parts would be unable to sufficiently or adequately perform this surge and subsequent masculinization.

Seen all the little boys who want to play dress up princess? How many boys in your generation could have been ‘made’ to behave in such a way and go to school dressed like that? Even IF your mom had ‘made you’?

Depending on generational structure, the little boys today are either f1, f2 or in some cases f3 from the original introduction of BPA into the food supply (via containers and serving pieces) in the late 1960’s.


30 posted on 09/09/2013 8:45:54 PM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: ChildOfThe60s

This is an interesting thread that Pharmboy posted this morning (9/10/13):

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3065012/posts


35 posted on 09/10/2013 10:36:07 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson