Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-War Relic Ed Asner Admits Race Shields Obama from Leftist Criticism
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | September 9, 2013 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 09/09/2013 12:51:27 PM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: henkster
Stalin threw away the lives of his soldiers like yesterday’s newspaper, too. It served the ends of the Party.

I've only seen one film that accurately depicted the Soviet government's treatment of soldiers and generals in World War II, and that's Enemy at the Gates (Jude Law, Rachel Weisz, Ron Perlman). They showed Russian draftees being hoorawed off trains onto barges, then across the river and directly into the assault on well-defended German positions.

They also showed Nikita Khrushchev as Stalin's delivery-boy: delivering one brand-new, factory-fresh Tokarev pistol to a general whose attack had broken down. That's how Stalin did business.

21 posted on 09/09/2013 5:21:30 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wally_bert
RE I watched Lou Grant way back when. Mtm never did much for me either.

One of my cable channels was playing it daily a few years ago on a family type channel and I started watching it and it brought back memories of the early 1980s.

Each episode got off on a couple of investigative themes, some involving the main characters. The actress who played paper's owner (a widow of papers owner) back then, was after 20 years later in 2000 played Tony Soprano's mother.

Its so early 1980s/late 1970s like drama centered around these human interest stories about some valid injustice or another that usually the paper would expose. Usually some corruption or an uncaring corporation.

It was pretty tame and moderate compared to what we are used to today.

22 posted on 09/09/2013 9:06:29 PM PDT by sickoflibs (To GOP : Any path to US Citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
D not doubt me. The civil rights movement, the marches in the sixties, all of that is exactly why Hollywood's liberal on everything else.

No.

Hollywood is liberal because of the embracing of the Communist party back in the teens and twenties.

Although it could also be argued that Hollywood is liberal because of the nature of the people who are attracted to show business.

There is a reason why actors, stage dancers and singers were in the past considered low class and lacking in moral sense.

23 posted on 09/09/2013 9:12:46 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Revenge is a dish best served with pinto beans and muffins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson