Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RoosterRedux
I think Norman Norman Podhoretz has been reading our mail:

Dangerous Times: Are Obama's Syrian Stumbles Good for America?

9/7/2013 5:58:36 PM · 11 of 37

nathanbedford to RoosterRedux

By now it's impossible to avoid the conclusion that Obama is fervently anti-American. Which is what you might learn from his personal history, all the way from Mom the Stalinist, to his "mentor" Frank Davis the child pornographer, all the way to the "Reverend" Jerry Wright and the Alinsky Machine in Chicago The only incongruity in the quoted portion above is the qualification "by now." There were many of us who posted countless times before Obama was sworn in that his biography, his autobiography, his associations, and his writings as well is his public statements all compel the conclusion that he was a radical leftist, perhaps a Manchurian Muslim, and no friend of the United States of America.

One might take issue with the author's assessment that Obama is a bumbler, it might be rather that he has a very difficult needle to thread which is to consistently aid the enemies of America, for example, as the author points out, the Muslim brotherhood, while not appearing blatant about it. It is difficult to know exactly what Obama's hidden agenda is but he cannot act entirely as a free agent even among his most trusted White House intimates and certainly not with such public figures as John Kerry or Chuck Hagel. That is not to say that these men share our agenda but it is to say that they would certainly react to any overt act of treason they observed in Obama. At least Obama cannot be certain that they would fail to react.

Finally, it is well to remember that Obama is a radical leftist and that is an animal very different from a leftist like Jimmy Carter. Obama is not Jimmy Carter on steroids. Obama is an entirely different kind of leftist, one who aggressively seeks to diminish America and remove it as the principal obstacle to one world socialism (or a worldwide caliphate if you are in that camp). These aggressive leftists, think Trotsky, chairman Mao, Pol Pot, Stalin are to a man indifferent to human suffering and quite willing to order an effusion of blood to advance their own power. I do not believe for a minute that Obama will shrink from waging war to advance his agenda. I think his problem is to find an inflection point which the public will accept and which advances a cause which the public, if aware of its real purpose, would oppose bitterly.


27 posted on 09/09/2013 10:36:09 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford
lol...I think your case for plagiarism or at least theft of ideas against Podhoretz will hold up in court of Freeper peers.

As to whether Kerry or Hagel would take action if they thought he were engaged in treasonous acts...it depends on what Obama's NSA has on these guys.

Like you, I've never thought Barry was incompetent unless viewed from a traditional American POV. He's done a fine job of destroying the country...and that appears to have always been his goal.

33 posted on 09/09/2013 10:47:26 AM PDT by RoosterRedux (The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.” Socrates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford

On a more serious note, I wouldn’t be at all surprised in Norman Podhoretz spent his late evenings reading FR threads.


34 posted on 09/09/2013 10:52:11 AM PDT by RoosterRedux (The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.” Socrates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson